...
首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis & Prevention >Validity of failure-caused traffic conflicts as surrogates of rear-end collisions in naturalistic driving studies
【24h】

Validity of failure-caused traffic conflicts as surrogates of rear-end collisions in naturalistic driving studies

机译:失败导致的交通冲突的有效性作为自然主义驾驶研究中的后端碰撞的代理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Although the frequency and severity of crashes are direct measures of road safety, crash data are typically of limited quality and they require long data collection periods to produce conclusive results. Surrogates of crashes that would allow a quick and accurate estimation of safety have been an active topic for years. Among multiple alternatives, traffic conflicts have been established as a promising surrogate measure. This paper is aimed to demonstrate the validity of failure-caused traffic conflicts by applying a recently proposed Lomax-based method to estimate the expected number of crashes from observed traffic conflicts.The data collected in the naturalistic driving program, the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2), were used in the validation task. The rear-end crashes recorded during the SHRP2 program and the corresponding rear-end traffic conflicts were analyzed for three categories of drivers: young male, mature male, and mature female. Past research has indicated that these three categories have a distinctively different proneness to involvement in crashes. Out of all rear-end traffic conflicts included in the SHRP2 database, 1.4 % were used to estimate the crash frequencies and rates for each studied type of driver. The Lomax distribution was applied within the counterfactual framework. Then, the conflict-based crash rate estimates were compared to the crash rates of the studied types of drivers calculated from all the rear-end crashes observed in the SHRP2 study period.The conflict-based rate estimates followed well the crash-based rates and the existing knowledge about the safety performance of the studied drivers. The conflict-based results confirmed the over-representation of young male drivers in crashes. It was also confirmed that mature male drivers are involved in rear-end crashes more frequently than mature female drivers. The results demonstrate both the validity of the Lomax-based analysis of failure-caused traffic conflicts and the benefit of traffic conflicts analysis that considerably reduces a period of data collection from years for crashes to days or weeks for traffic conflicts.
机译:虽然崩溃的频率和严重程度是道路安全的直接测量,但崩溃数据通常具有有限的质量,并且它们需要长期数据收集期以产生确凿的结果。崩溃的替代品将允许快速准确地估算安全性是多年来的活动课题。在多种替代方案中,已经建立了交通冲突作为有前提的代理措施。本文旨在展示失败导致的交通冲突的有效性,通过应用最近提出的基于Lomax的方法来估计观察到的交通冲突的预期崩溃。在自然主义驾驶计划中收集的数据,第二次战略公路研究计划。 (SHRP2),用于验证任务。在SHRP2计划期间记录的后端崩溃和相应的后端交通冲突分析了三类司机:年轻男性,成熟的男性和成熟女性。过去的研究表明,这三个类别对参与崩溃具有明显不同的倾向。除了SHRP2数据库中包含的所有后端交通冲突中,1.4%用于估计每个研究驾驶员类型的碰撞频率和速率。 Lomax分布应用于反事实框架内。然后,将基于冲突的碰撞率估计与来自SHRP2研究期间观察到的所有后端崩溃计算的研究类型的驾驶员的崩溃速率进行了比较。基于冲突的速率估算率随之而来的基于崩溃的速率和关于研究司机安全性能的现有知识。基于冲突的结果证实了年轻男性司机在崩溃中的过度代表性。还证实,成熟的男性司机比成熟的女性司机更频繁地参与后端崩溃。结果表明,基于Lomax的失败造成的交通冲突的有效性以及交通冲突分析的好处,从而大大减少了多年来崩溃的数据收集期限或数周或数周。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号