首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis and Prevention >Antecedents of safety behavior in construction: A literature review and an integrated conceptual framework
【24h】

Antecedents of safety behavior in construction: A literature review and an integrated conceptual framework

机译:建设安全行为的前一种:文献综述和综合概念框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has been no scarcity in the literature of suggested antecedents of employee safety behavior, and this paper brings together the disaggregated antecedents of safety behavior in the construction field. In total, 101 eligible empirical articles are obtained. Bibliometric and context analyses are combined to identify the influential journals, scholars, keywords, use of theory, research methods, and countries or regions of the empirical samples. The 83 factors that are identified are divided into five groups, namely (a) individual characteristics, (b) workgroup interactions, (c) work and workplace design, (d) project management and organization, and (e) family, industry, and society. This indicates that the causes of safety behavior are manifold. Various factors from different systems likely work in concert to create situations in which an individual chooses to comply with safety rules and participate voluntarily in safety activities. Given this, we propose that safety behavior is only an ostensible symptom of more complex "The Self-Work-Home-Industry/Society" systems and establish a safety behavior antecedent analysis and classification model. Based on this model, we develop a resource flow model, illustrating why, how, and when the flow of resources between the five systems-namely the self system, work system, home system, work-home interface system, and industry/society system-either promotes or inhibits safety behavior. The safety behavior antecedent analysis and classification model and resource flow model are based mainly on bioecological system theory and resources theories. Avenues for future theoretical development and method designs are suggested based on the reviewed findings and the two conceptual models. The intention with this systematic review together with the two integrated conceptual models is to advance theoretical thinking on how safety behavior can be promoted, or instead, inhibited.
机译:员工安全行为的建议前进的文献中没有稀缺,本文汇集了建设领域的安全行为的分列的前进的。总计,获得101条符合条件的经验文章。缔约理和上下文分析组合以识别有影响力的期刊,学者,关键词,理论,研究方法以及经验样本的国家或地区。确定的83个因素分为五组,即(a)个人特征,(b)工作组互动,(c)工作和工作场所设计,(d)项目管理和组织,(e)家庭,行业和社会。这表明安全行为的原因是歧管。来自不同系统的各种因素可能会协同工作,以创造个人选择遵守安全规则并在安全活动中自动参与的情况。鉴于这一点,我们建议安全行为只是更复杂的“自我工作 - 家庭行业/社会”系统的表现形式,建立了安全行为前进分析和分类模型。基于此模型,我们开发了资源流模型,说明了五种系统之间资源流程的原因,说明了为什么,即自我系统,工作系统,家庭系统,工作室界面系统和行业/社会系统 - 促进或抑制安全行为。安全行为前一种分析和分类模型和资源流模型主要基于生物能源系统理论和资源理论。基于审查的调查结果和两个概念模型,建议了未来理论开发和方法设计的途径。与这两个综合概念模型一起的意图与两个综合概念模型一起推进了对如何促进安全行为的理论思考,或者是如何促进的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号