首页> 外文期刊>Accident Analysis and Prevention >Fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics for real-time assessment of rear-end collision risk. A study based on empirical observations
【24h】

Fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics for real-time assessment of rear-end collision risk. A study based on empirical observations

机译:模糊代理安全指标,进行后端碰撞风险的实时评估。基于经验观察的研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The present paper discusses two fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics (SSMs) for rear-end collision, the Proactive Fuzzy SSM (PFS) and Critical Fuzzy SSM (CFS). The objective is to investigate their applicability for evaluating the real-time rear-end risk of collision of vehicles to support the operations of advanced driver assistance and automated vehicle functionalities (from driving assistance systems to fully automated vehicles). The proposed Fuzzy SSMs are evaluated and compared to other traditional metrics on the basis of empirical observations. To achieve this goal, an experimental campaign was organized in the AstaZero proving ground in Sweden. The campaign consisted of two main parts: a car-following experiment with five vehicles solely driven by Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) systems and a safety critical experiment, testing the response of the Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system to avoid collisions on a static target. The proposed PFS is compared with the safe distance defined by the well-known Responsibility Sensitive Safety (RSS) model, showing that it can produce meaningful results in assessing safety conditions also without the use of crisp safety thresholds (like in the case of RSS). The CFS outperformed the well-known Time-To-Collision (TTC) SSM in the a-priori identification of the cases, where the tested vehicles were not able to avoid the collision with the static target. Moreover, results show that CFS at the time of the first deceleration is correlated with the velocity of the vehicle at the time of collisions with the target.
机译:本文讨论了用于后端碰撞的两个模糊代理安全指标(SSMS),主动模糊SSM(PFS)和临界模糊SSM(CFS)。目的是调查他们对评估车辆碰撞的实时后端风险的适用性,以支持先进的驾驶员辅助和自动化车辆功能的操作(从驾驶辅助系统到全自动车辆)。基于经验观察,评估所提出的模糊SSMS和与其他传统指标进行评估。为实现这一目标,在瑞典的斯塔格雷尔证明地面组织了一个实验活动。该活动由两种主要部分组成:汽车之后的实验,用自适应巡航控制(ACC)系统和安全关键实验,测试了五种车辆,测试了自主紧急制动(AEB)系统的响应,以避免静态碰撞目标。将所提出的PFS与由众所周知的责任敏感安全(RSS)模型定义的安全距离进行比较,表明它可以在不使用清晰的安全阈值(如RSS的情况下)产生有意义的结果。 。 CFS在a-priori识别情况下表现出众所周知的碰撞(TTC)SSM,其中测试的车辆无法避免与静态目标的碰撞。此外,结果表明,第一减速时的CF在与目标碰撞时的车辆的速度相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号