首页> 外文期刊>Academy of management learning & education >The Alienation of Scholarship in Modern Business Schools: From MarxistMaterial Relations to the Lacanian Subject
【24h】

The Alienation of Scholarship in Modern Business Schools: From MarxistMaterial Relations to the Lacanian Subject

机译:现代商学院的奖学金异化:从马克思主义物质关系到拉康主义学科

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this essay, we theorize the fragmented nature of the alienation experienced by management scholars working in neoliberal universities. We argue that management scholars not only suffer from the detachment of labor from product (e.g., research and teaching) as material economic relations determine, but by adding a psychoanalytic perspective, we claim that they also must enjoy this process as a necessity of a neoliberal logic that reinforces anxiety. Hence, we argue that alienation should be approached as a potential to fulfill when considering troubling production relations in business schools. In terms of the implications addressing primarily our colleagues, we suggest hystericizing our alienation from our labor with simple acts of critique in management education and research. In other words, by hystericizing, we mean not only asking questions to produce more knowledge for the market, but also always staying in a questioning mode and being dissatisfied with the answers.
机译:在本文中,我们对在新自由主义大学工作的管理学者所经历的疏远化的理论进行了理论化。我们认为,管理学者不仅因物质经济关系决定而使劳动从产品(例如研究和教学)中脱离出来,而且通过增加一种精神分析的观点,我们声称他们还必须享受这一过程,这是新自由主义的必要条件加剧焦虑的逻辑。因此,我们认为,在考虑困扰商学院的生产关系时,应该将疏远视为一种实现的可能。就主要针对我们同事的影响而言,我们建议在管理教育和研究中采取简单的批判行为,以隔离我们与工作的疏远。换句话说,通过歇斯底里化,我们的意思不仅是提出问题以为市场生产更多的知识,而且还意味着始终停留在提问模式中并且对答案不满意。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号