...
首页> 外文期刊>Abacus >Reporting on Infrastructure in Australia: Practices and Management Preferences
【24h】

Reporting on Infrastructure in Australia: Practices and Management Preferences

机译:澳大利亚基础设施报告:实践和管理偏好

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A major responsibility of governments worldwide is to maintain and upgrade state-owned physical infrastructure. Yet contemporary accounting reports fail to recognize commitments arising from deferred maintenance, and the usefulness of descriptions of book values and depreciation charges on those assets is questionable. A range of options for reporting more fully on infrastructure assets has been proposed but little evidence has been presented as to how stakeholders view alternative forms of information obtained in terms of those options. This study presents evidence obtained from telephone and mail surveys about the attitudes of engineers, accounting and finance professionals and other senior managers of Australian public sector agencies towards current infrastructure reporting practices. Most of the surveyed agencies actively managed their infrastructure assets and routinely compiled information about asset condition. The majority of respondents indicated that maintaining the functionality of physical infrastructure was critical to the success of their organization. Against this background, respondents were asked to indicate which among five nominated reporting options was likely to better aid judgments about a series of issues concerning the status and management of infrastructure, and finally what reporting option had the most overall usefulness to decision making. The judgments identified were likely to be common to both managers and external stakeholders. The findings were that respondents, irrespective of their organizational affiliation or professional background, overwhelmingly preferred information about the physical condition of assets, combined with estimates of the current cost of bringing those assets to a satisfactory condition (with some respondents indicating a preference for the data to be accompanied by information about written-down replacement costs). Historical cost accounting received little support from respondents.
机译:全世界政府的主要职责是维护和升级国有物理基础设施。然而,现代会计报告未能确认由于延期维护而产生的承诺,因此对这些资产的账面价值和折旧费用说明的有用性值得怀疑。已经提出了一系列用于更全面地报告基础设施资产的选项,但是很少有证据表明利益相关者如何看待根据这些选项获得的替代信息形式。这项研究提供了从电话和邮件调查中获得的证据,这些证据表明工程师,会计和财务专业人士以及澳大利亚公共部门机构的其他高级管理人员对当前基础设施报告做法的态度。大多数接受调查的机构积极管理其基础设施资产,并定期汇编有关资产状况的信息。大多数受访者表示,维护物理基础架构的功能对于其组织的成功至关重要。在这种背景下,要求受访者指出在五个提名的报告选项中,哪一个可能更好地帮助对一系列有关基础设施状态和管理的问题做出判断,最后,哪种报告选项对决策最有用。所确定的判断可能对管理人员和外部利益相关者都是共同的。调查结果是,无论其组织隶属关系或专业背景如何,受访者都压倒性地首选有关资产实际状况的信息,以及使资产达到令人满意状态的当前成本的估计值(有些受访者表示偏好数据)并附有减记的重置成本信息)。历史成本会计很少得到受访者的支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号