首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes determined by gated single photon emission computed tomography – a comparison between two quantification methods
【2h】

Normal limits for left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes determined by gated single photon emission computed tomography – a comparison between two quantification methods

机译:门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描确定的左心室射血分数和体积的正常极限值–两种定量方法之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare gender-related normal limits for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV and ESV), obtained using two myocardial perfusion-gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) quantification methods. A total of 185 patients were retrospectively selected from a consecutive series of patients examined for coronary artery disease (CAD) or for management of known CAD. Patients were included in the study group if they had normal or probably normal results with stress and rest perfusion imaging and if the combined interpretation of perfusion studies and gated rest studies showed no signs or suspicion of myocardial infarction. The gated SPECT studies were performed using a 2-day stress/gated rest Tc-99m sestamibi protocol. All patient studies were processed using CAFU and quantitative-gated SPECT (QGS), the two software packages for quantification of gated SPECT images. The lower normal limits for EF were higher for CAFU compared with QGS for both women (59% versus 53%) and men (54% versus 47%). The upper normal limits for EDV were also higher for CAFU compared with QGS for both women (133 versus 107 ml) and men (182 versus 161 ml). The differences between the software packages were small for ESV (women 44 versus 44 ml; men 69 versus 74 ml). Gender-specific normal limits need to be applied for LV EF and volumes determined by gated SPECT. Separate criteria for abnormal LV EF and EDV need to be used for women and men depending on the software package used.
机译:为了比较使用两种心肌灌注门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)定量方法获得的左室射血分数(EF),舒张末期和收缩末期容积(EDV和ESV)的性别相关正常限值。从连续的一系列冠心病(CAD)检查或已知CAD处理患者中回顾性选择了总共185名患者。如果患者的压力和静息灌注成像结果正常或可能正常,并且灌注研究和门控静息研究的综合解释未发现或怀疑有心肌梗塞,则将其纳入研究组。使用2天压力/门控静止Tc-99m sestamibi方案进行门控SPECT研究。所有患者研究均使用CAFU和定量门控SPECT(QGS)(两种用于定量门控SPECT图像的软件包)进行处理。女性(59%对53%)和男性(54%对47%)的CAFU EF正常下限均高于QGS。女性(133对107 ml)和男性(182对161 ml)相比,CAFU的EDV正常上限也高于QGS。 ESV软件包之间的差异很小(女性44对比44毫升;男性69对比74毫升)。 LV EF和门控SPECT确定的体积需要应用特定于性别的正常限值。对于男性和女性,需要使用单独的LV EF和EDV异常标准,具体取决于所使用的软件包。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号