首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Assessing satisfaction with social care services among black and minority ethnic and white British carers of stroke survivors in England
【2h】

Assessing satisfaction with social care services among black and minority ethnic and white British carers of stroke survivors in England

机译:评估英格兰黑人和少数民族白人和英国卒中幸存者的社会护理服务满意度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Overall satisfaction levels with social care are usually high but lower levels have been reported among black and minority ethnic (BME) service users in England. Reasons for this are poorly understood. This qualitative study therefore explored satisfaction with services among informal carer participants from five different ethnic groups. Fifty‐seven carers (black Caribbean, black African, Asian Indian, Asian Pakistani and white British) were recruited from voluntary sector organisations and a local hospital in England, and took part in semi‐structured interviews using cognitive interviewing and the critical incident technique. Interviews took place from summer 2013 to spring 2014. Thematic analysis of the interviews showed that participants often struggled to identify specific ‘incidents’, especially satisfactory ones. When describing satisfactory services, participants talked mostly about specific individuals and relationships. Unsatisfactory experiences centred on services overall. When rating services using cognitive interviewing, explicit comparisons with expectations or experiences with other services were common. Highest satisfaction ratings tended to be justified by positive personal characteristics among practitioners, trust and relationships. Lower level ratings were mostly explained by inconsistency in services, insufficient or poor care. Lowest level ratings were rare. Overall, few differences between ethnic groups were identified, although white British participants rated services higher overall giving more top ratings. White British participants also frequently took a more overall view of services, highlighting some concerns but still giving top ratings, while South Asian carers in particular focused on negative aspects of services. Together these methods provide insight into what participants mean by satisfactory and unsatisfactory services. Cognitive interviewing was more challenging for some BME participants, possibly a reflection of the meaningfulness of the concept of service satisfaction to them. Future research should include comparisons between BME and white participants’ understanding of the most positive parts of satisfaction scales and should focus on dissatisfied participants.
机译:人们对社会服务的总体满意度通常很高,但是据报道,在英格兰的黑人和少数民族(BME)服务使用者中,满意度较低。原因尚不清楚。因此,这项定性研究探索了来自五个不同种族群体的非正式护理人员对服务的满意度。从志愿部门组织和英格兰当地一家医院招募了57名护理人员(黑人加勒比,黑人非洲,亚洲印第安人,亚洲巴基斯坦人和白人英国人),并使用认知访谈和关键事件技术参加了半结构化访谈。访谈于2013年夏季至2014年春季进行。对访谈的主题分析表明,参与者经常难以确定具体的“事件”,尤其是令人满意的事件。在描述满意的服务时,参与者主要谈论特定的个人和关系。不满意的体验集中在整体服务上。使用认知访谈对服务进行评分时,通常会与期望或其他服务的体验进行显式比较。从业者,信任和关系中积极的个人特征往往可以证明最高的满意度。较低等级的评分主要是由于服务不一致,护理不足或护理不佳所致。最低等级的评级很少见。总体而言,虽然白人白人参与者对服务的总体评价较高,但评分较高,因此几乎没有种族差异。英国白人参与者还经常对服务进行更全面的了解,强调了一些担忧,但仍给予最高评价,而南亚护理人员则特别关注服务的负面方面。这些方法共同提供了对参与者满意和不满意服务意味着什么的见解。对于一些BME参与者而言,认知访谈更具挑战性,这可能反映了服务满意度概念对他们的意义。未来的研究应包括BME与白人参与者对满意度量表中最积极部分的理解之间的比较,并应关注不满意的参与者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号