首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor‐specific antibody levels after belatacept‐ versus cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT
【2h】

Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor‐specific antibody levels after belatacept‐ versus cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT

机译:贝拉西普与环孢素免疫抑制后移植后供体特异性抗体水平的降低:BENEFIT和BENEFIT-EXT的事后分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT were phase III studies of cytotoxic T‐cell crossmatch–negative kidney transplant recipients randomized to belatacept more intense (MI)‐based, belatacept less intense (LI)‐based, or cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression. Following study completion, presence/absence of HLA‐specific antibodies was determined centrally via solid‐phase flow cytometry screening. Stored sera from anti‐HLA–positive patients were further tested with a single‐antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of donor‐specific antibodies (DSAs), and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. The effect of belatacept‐based and cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression on MFI was explored post hoc in patients with preexisting DSAs enrolled to BENEFIT and BENEFIT‐EXT. In style="fixed-case">BENEFIT, preexisting style="fixed-case">DSAs were detected in 4.6%, 4.9%, and 6.3% of belatacept style="fixed-case">MI‐treated, belatacept style="fixed-case">LI‐treated, and cyclosporine‐treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in style="fixed-case">BENEFIT‐ style="fixed-case">EXT were 6.0%, 5.7%, and 9.2%. In both studies, most preexisting style="fixed-case">DSAs were of class I specificity. Over the first 24 months posttransplant, a greater proportion of preexisting style="fixed-case">DSAs in belatacept‐treated versus cyclosporine‐treated patients exhibited decreases or no change in style="fixed-case">MFI. style="fixed-case">MFI decline was more apparent with belatacept style="fixed-case">MI‐based versus belatacept style="fixed-case">LI‐based immunosuppression in both studies and more pronounced in style="fixed-case">BENEFIT‐ style="fixed-case">EXT versus style="fixed-case">BENEFIT. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept‐based immunosuppression decreases preexisting style="fixed-case">DSAs more effectively than cyclosporine‐based immunosuppression.
机译:BENEFIT和BENEFIT-EXT是针对细胞毒性T细胞交叉匹配阴性肾移植受者的III期研究,随机分为基于belatacept强度较高(MI),基于belatacept强度较低(LI)或基于环孢素的免疫抑制。研究完成后,通过固相流式细胞术筛选集中确定HLA特异性抗体的存在与否。来自抗HLA阳性患者的储存血清用单抗原珠测定法进一步测试,以确定抗体特异性,是否存在供体特异性抗体(DSA)以及任何存在的DSA的平均荧光强度(MFI)。在既往已纳入BENEFIT和BENEFIT-EXT的DSA患者中,事后探讨了基于belatacept和基于环孢素的免疫抑制对MFI的影响。在 style =“ fixed-case”> BENEFIT 中,在belatacept 的4.6%,4.9%和6.3%中检测到预先存在的 style =“ fixed-case”> DSA 分别接受style =“ fixed-case”> MI 治疗,接受贝拉西普 style =“ fixed-case”> LI 治疗和环孢素治疗的患者。 style =“ fixed-case”> BENEFIT - style =“ fixed-case”> EXT 中的相应值分别为6.0%,5.7%和9.2%。在两项研究中,大多数先前存在的 style =“ fixed-case”> DSA 都属于I类特异性。在移植后的前24个月中,接受belatacept治疗和环孢素治疗的患者中,已有的 style =“ fixed-case”> DSA 中有较大比例的患者 style =“ fixed- case“> MFI 。与基于belatacept的belatacept style =“ fixed-case”> MFI 的下降相比,与基于belatacept style =“ fixed-case”>两项研究均基于LI 的免疫抑制,在 style =“ fixed-case”> BENEFIT - style =“ fixed-case”> EXT 与 style =“ fixed-case”>受益。尽管是事后得出的,但这些数据表明,基于贝拉西普的免疫抑制比基于环孢素的免疫抑制更有效地降低了现有的 style =“ fixed-case”> DSA

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号