首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Documenting archaeological thin sections in high‐resolution: A comparison of methods and discussion of applications
【2h】

Documenting archaeological thin sections in high‐resolution: A comparison of methods and discussion of applications

机译:高分辨率记录考古薄片:方法比较和应用讨论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Optical thin section observations represent the core empirical basis for most micromorphological interpretations at archaeological sites. These observations, which often vary in size and shape, are usually documented through digital graphic representations such as photomicrographs, scans, or figures. Due to variability in documentation practices, however, visual thin section data can be captured with a range of methods and in many different formats and resolutions. In this paper, we compare and evaluate five common image‐based methods for documenting thin sections in high‐resolution: a flatbed scanner, a film scanner, a macro photography rig, and conventional stereo and light microscopes. Through the comparison results, we demonstrate that advances in digital imaging technology now allow for fast and high‐resolution visual recording of entire thin sections up to at least ×30 magnification. We suggest that adopting a digital micromorphological documentation practice has several advantages. First, a digital thin section may be observed more efficiently and consistently, for example, on a computer screen, and the spatial configuration of large or complex features may be more accurately documented. Second, they allow for the establishment of digital repositories that may promote scientific reproducibility and inter‐laboratory communication, as well as lay the foundations for more consensus‐based educational training of archaeological micromorphology.
机译:光学薄层观测代表了考古现场大多数微观形态解释的核心经验基础。这些观察结果(通常大小和形状各不相同)通常通过数字图形表示形式进行记录,例如显微照片,扫描图或图形。但是,由于文档实践的差异,可以使用多种方法以及许多不同的格式和分辨率来捕获可视化的薄层数据。在本文中,我们比较并评估了五种基于图像的常用高分辨率高分辨率文件记录方法:平板扫描仪,胶片扫描仪,微距摄影装置以及常规的立体和光学显微镜。通过比较结果,我们证明了数字成像技术的进步现在允许快速且高分辨率的可视化记录整个薄切片,放大率至少为×30。我们建议采用数字微形态学文献记录实践有几个优点。首先,可以在例如计算机屏幕上更有效,更一致地观察到数字薄部分,并且可以更准确地记录大型或复杂特征的空间配置。其次,它们允许建立数字存储库,以促进科学再现性和实验室间的交流,并为基于考古学的微观形态的基于共识的教育培训奠定基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号