首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation >Functional Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Respiratory Care
【2h】

Functional Electrical Stimulation in Spinal Cord Injury Respiratory Care

机译:脊髓损伤呼吸系统护理中的功能性电刺激

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The management of chronic respiratory insufficiency and/or long-term inability to breathe independently has traditionally been via positive-pressure ventilation through a mechanical ventilator. Although life-sustaining, it is associated with limitations of function, lack of independence, decreased quality of life, sleep disturbance, and increased risk for infections. In addition, its mechanical and electronic complexity requires full understanding of the possible malfunctions by patients and caregivers. Ventilator-associated pneumonia, tracheal injury, and equipment malfunction account for common complications of prolonged ventilation, and respiratory infections are the most common cause of death in spinal cord–injured patients. The development of functional electric stimulation (FES) as an alternative to mechanical ventilation has been motivated by a goal to improve the quality of life of affected individuals. In this article, we will review the physiology, types, characteristics, risks and benefits, surgical techniques, and complications of the 2 commercially available FES strategies – phrenic nerve pacing (PNP) and diaphragm motor point pacing (DMPP).
机译:慢性呼吸功能不全和/或长期不能自主呼吸的管理传统上是通过机械呼吸机进行正压通气。尽管可以维持生命,但它与功能受限,缺乏独立性,生活质量下降,睡眠障碍和感染风险增加有关。另外,其机械和电子复杂性要求患者和护理人员充分了解可能的故障。呼吸机相关性肺炎,气管损伤和设备故障是长时间通气的常见并发症,而呼吸道感染是脊髓损伤患者最常见的死亡原因。旨在改善患病者生活质量的目标推动了功能性电刺激(FES)替代机械通气的发展。在本文中,我们将介绍两种市售FES策略(–神经起搏(PNP)和diaphragm肌运动点起搏(DMPP))的生理学,类型,特征,风险和益处,手术技术以及并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号