首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Consciousness free will and moral responsibility: Taking the folk seriously
【2h】

Consciousness free will and moral responsibility: Taking the folk seriously

机译:意识自由意志和道德责任:认真对待民间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper, I offer evidence that folk views of free will and moral responsibility accord a central place to consciousness. In sections 2 and 3, I contrast action production via conscious states and processes with action in concordance with an agent's long-standing and endorsed motivations, values, and character traits. Results indicate that conscious action production is considered much more important for free will than is concordance with motivations, values, and character traits. In section 4, I contrast the absence of consciousness with the presence of consciousness in behaviorally identical agents. Most participants attribute free will to conscious agents, but not to nonconscious agents. Focusing in particular on two leading views of free will and moral responsibility, namely, Deep Self and Reasons-Responsive Views, I argue that these results present philosophers of mind and action with the following explanatory burden: develop a substantive theory of the connection between consciousness on the one hand and free will and moral responsibility on the other that takes folk views on this connection seriously.
机译:在本文中,我提供了证据表明,民间的自由意志和道德责任观是意识的中心位置。在第2部分和第3部分中,我将通过有意识的状态和过程产生的行动与行为与行动者长期存在并认可的动机,价值观和性格特征相比较。结果表明,对于自由意志而言,有意识的行动产生比与动机,价值和性格特征的一致性要重要得多。在第4节中,我对比了在行为相同的行为者中意识的缺失与意识的存在。大多数参与者将自由意志归功于有意识的行动者,而不是无意识的行动者。我特别关注自由意志和道德责任这两种主要观点,即深层自我和理性回应观点,我认为这些结果给思想和行动的哲学家带来以下解释性负担:建立意识之间联系的实质性理论。一方面,自由意志和道义上的责任使人们对这种联系产生了严重的看法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号