首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Trends for nanotechnology development in China Russia and India
【2h】

Trends for nanotechnology development in China Russia and India

机译:中国俄罗斯和印度的纳米技术发展趋势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

China, Russia, and India are playing an increasingly important role in global nanotechnology research and development (R&D). This paper comparatively inspects the paper and patent publications by these three countries in the Thomson Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI) database and United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) database (1976–2007). Bibliographic, content map, and citation network analyses are used to evaluate country productivity, dominant research topics, and knowledge diffusion patterns. Significant and consistent growth in nanotechnology papers are noted in the three countries. Between 2000 and 2007, the average annual growth rate was 31.43% in China, 11.88% in Russia, and 33.51% in India. During the same time, the growth patterns were less consistent in patent publications: the corresponding average rates are 31.13, 10.41, and 5.96%. The three countries’ paper impact measured by the average number of citations has been lower than the world average. However, from 2000 to 2007, it experienced rapid increases of about 12.8 times in China, 8 times in India, and 1.6 times in Russia. The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), and the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) were the most productive institutions in paper publication, with 12,334, 6,773, and 1,831 papers, respectively. The three countries emphasized some common research topics such as “Quantum dots,” “Carbon nanotubes,” “Atomic force microscopy,” and “Scanning electron microscopy,” while Russia and India reported more research on nano-devices as compared with China. CAS, RAS, and IIT played key roles in the respective domestic knowledge diffusion.
机译:中国,俄罗斯和印度在全球纳米技术研发(R&D)中发挥着越来越重要的作用。本文比较了这三个国家在Thomson科学引文索引扩展(SCI)数据库和美国专利商标局(USPTO)数据库(1976-2007年)中的论文和专利出版物。书目,内容地图和引文网络分析用于评估国家的生产力,主要研究主题和知识传播模式。三个国家注意到纳米技术论文的显着且持续增长。从2000年到2007年,中国的年均增长率为31.43%,俄罗斯为11.88%,印度为33.51%。在同一时期,专利出版物的增长模式不太一致:相应的平均增长率为31.13、10.41和5.96%。以平均引用次数衡量,这三个国家的论文影响力低于世界平均水平。但是,从2000年到2007年,中国迅速增长了约12.8倍,印度增长了8倍,俄罗斯增长了1.6倍。中国科学院(CAS),俄罗斯科学院(RAS)和印度理工学院(IIT)是论文出版领域生产力最高的机构,分别拥有12,334、6,773和1,831篇论文。这三个国家强调了一些共同的研究主题,例如“量子点”,“碳纳米管”,“原子力显微镜”和“扫描电子显微镜”,而俄罗斯和印度报告了与中国相比更多的纳米器件研究。 CAS,RAS和IIT在各自的国内知识传播中发挥了关键作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号