首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >On computational approaches for size-and-shape distributions from sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation
【2h】

On computational approaches for size-and-shape distributions from sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation

机译:沉降速度分析超速离心的大小和形状分布的计算方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation has become a very popular technique to study size distributions and interactions of macromolecules. Recently, a method termed two-dimensional spectrum analysis (2DSA) for the determination of size-and-shape distributions was described by Demeler and colleagues (Eur Biophys J ). It is based on novel ideas conceived for fitting the integral equations of the size-and-shape distribution to experimental data, illustrated with an example but provided without proof of the principle of the algorithm. In the present work, we examine the 2DSA algorithm by comparison with the mathematical reference frame and simple well-known numerical concepts for solving Fredholm integral equations, and test the key assumptions underlying the 2DSA method in an example application. While the 2DSA appears computationally excessively wasteful, key elements also appear to be in conflict with mathematical results. This raises doubts about the correctness of the results from 2DSA analysis.
机译:沉降速度分析超速离心已经成为研究大分子的大小分布和相互作用的一种非常流行的技术。最近,Demeler及其同事(Eur Biophys J)描述了一种用于确定尺寸和形状分布的称为二维光谱分析(2DSA)的方法。它基于为将尺寸和形状分布的积分方程拟合到实验数据而构思的新颖思想,并通过示例进行了举例说明,但未提供算法原理的证明。在本工作中,我们通过与数学参考框架和用于求解Fredholm积分方程的简单众所周知的数值概念进行比较来研究2DSA算法,并在示例应用程序中测试2DSA方法背后的关键假设。尽管2DSA在计算上显得过于浪费,但关键要素似乎也与数学结果相冲突。这使人们对2DSA分析结果的正确性产生怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号