首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3): A Comparison Between 561 Female Eating Disorders Patients and 878 Females from the General Population
【2h】

Validating the Eating Disorder Inventory-3 (EDI-3): A Comparison Between 561 Female Eating Disorders Patients and 878 Females from the General Population

机译:验证饮食失调清单3(EDI-3):561名女性饮食失调患者和878名普通人群中的女性之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Eating Disorder Inventory (EDI) is used worldwide in research and clinical work. The 3rd version (EDI-3) has been used in recent research, yet without any independent testing of its psychometric properties. The aim of the present study was twofold: 1) to establish national norms and to compare them with the US and international norms, and 2) to examine the factor structure, the internal consistency, the sensitivity and the specificity of subscale scores. Participants were Danish adult female patients (N = 561) from a specialist treatment centre and a control group (N = 878) was women selected from the Danish Civil Registration system. Small but significant differences were found between Danish and international, as well as US norms. Overall, the factor structure was confirmed, the internal consistency of the subscales was satisfactory, the discriminative validity was good, and sensitivity and specificity were excellent. The implications from these results are discussed.
机译:饮食失调量表(EDI)在全球范围内用于研究和临床工作。 3 rd 版本(EDI-3)已用于最近的研究,但尚未对其心理测量特性进行任何独立的测试。本研究的目的是双重的:1)建立国家规范并将其与美国和国际规范进行比较; 2)研究因素结构,内部一致性,敏感性和特异度。参加者是来自专科治疗中心的丹麦成年女性患者(N = 561),对照组(N = 878)是从丹麦民事登记系统中选出的女性。发现丹麦与国际之间以及美国的规范之间存在细微但重要的差异。总体而言,已确认因子结构,各量表的内部一致性令人满意,判别效度良好,敏感性和特异性均极佳。讨论了这些结果的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号