首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >WHO Strategy for Collecting Safety Data in Public Health Programmes: Complementing Spontaneous Reporting Systems
【2h】

WHO Strategy for Collecting Safety Data in Public Health Programmes: Complementing Spontaneous Reporting Systems

机译:世卫组织在公共卫生规划中收集安全数据的战略:补充自发报告系统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Globally, national pharmacovigilance systems rely on spontaneous reporting in which suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are reported to a national coordinating centre by health professionals, manufacturers or patients. Spontaneous reporting systems are the easiest to establish and the cheapest to run but suffer from poor-quality reports and underreporting. It is difficult to estimate rates and frequencies of ADRs through spontaneous reporting. Public health programmes need to quantify and characterize risks to individuals and communities from their medicines, to minimize harm and improve use, to sustain public confidence in the programmes, and to track problems due to medication errors and poor quality medicines. Additional methods are therefore needed to monitor the quantitative aspects of medicine safety, to better identify specific risk factors and high-risk groups, and to characterize ADRs associated with specific medicines and in specific populations. The present paper introduces two methods, cohort event monitoring and targeted spontaneous reporting, that are being implemented by the WHO, in its public health programmes, to complement spontaneous reporting. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods and how each can be applied in clinical practice are discussed.
机译:在全球范围内,国家药物警戒系统依靠自发报告,在该报告中,卫生专业人员,制造商或患者向国家协调中心报告可疑药物不良反应(ADR)。自发报告系统最容易建立,运行起来也最便宜,但是报告质量差且报告不足。通过自发报告很难估计ADR的发生率和频率。公共卫生计划需要量化和表征药物对个人和社区的风险,以最大程度地减少危害和改善使用,维持公众对该计划的信心,并跟踪由于用药错误和劣质药物引起的问题。因此,需要其他方法来监控药物安全性的定量方面,以更好地识别特定的危险因素和高风险人群,以及表征与特定药物和特定人群相关的ADR。本文介绍了两种方法,即队列事件监测和有针对性的自发报告,世卫组织正在其公共卫生规划中实施这两种方法,以补充自发报告。讨论了这些方法的优缺点以及每种方法如何在临床实践中应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号