首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Eribulin mesylate versus ixabepilone in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized Phase II study comparing the incidence of peripheral neuropathy
【2h】

Eribulin mesylate versus ixabepilone in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a randomized Phase II study comparing the incidence of peripheral neuropathy

机译:甲磺酸依瑞布林与依沙比普隆治疗转移性乳腺癌的患者:一项随机II期研究比较了周围神经病变的发生率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Peripheral neuropathy is a common toxicity associated with tubulin-targeted chemotherapeutic agents. This Phase II study compares the incidence and severity of neuropathy associated with eribulin mesylate or ixabepilone in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The primary objective was to assess the incidence of neuropathy; the study was designed to detect a difference in neuropathy rate of 35 % for eribulin versus 63 % for ixabepilone (odds ratio 0.316, 80 % power, 0.05 two-sided significance level). Eligibility criteria included: MBC; prior taxane therapy; at least one chemotherapy for advanced disease; no or minimal pre-existing neuropathy (Grade 0 or 1). The intent-to-treat population comprised 104 patients randomized (1:1) to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m2, 2–5 min intravenous on days 1 and 8) or ixabepilone (40 mg/m2, 3 h intravenous on day 1) on a 21-day cycle. 101 patients in the safety population received a median of 5.0 eribulin and 3.5 ixabepilone cycles. Incidence of neuropathy (any grade) was 33.3 and 48.0 %, and peripheral neuropathy was 31.4 and 44.0 % for eribulin and ixabepilone, respectively. After controlling for pre-existing neuropathy and number of prior chemotherapies, these differences were not significant. Compared with ixabepilone, fewer patients receiving eribulin discontinued treatment due to neuropathy (3.9 vs. 18.0 %) or adverse events (AEs) in general (11.8 vs. 32.0 %). Time to onset of neuropathy was 35.9 weeks for eribulin and 11.6 weeks for ixabepilone, and time to resolution was 48 versus 10 weeks, respectively; other AEs were comparable. Objective responses were 15.4 versus 5.8 % and clinical benefit rates were 26.9 versus 19.2 %. In conclusion, after controlling for pre-existing neuropathy and number of prior chemotherapies, the differences in the incidence of neuropathy with eribulin and ixabepilone were not statistically significant. Onset of neuropathy tended to occur later with eribulin and resolve later.
机译:周围神经病变是与微管蛋白靶向化疗药物相关的常见毒性。这项II期研究比较了转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中与甲磺酸艾瑞布林或依沙贝比隆相关的神经病变的发生率和严重程度。主要目的是评估神经病的发生率。该研究旨在检测eribulin与ixabepilone的神经病变率差异为35%(比值比为0.316,功效为80%,两侧显着性水平为0.05)。资格标准包括:MBC;先前的紫杉烷疗法;至少一种用于晚期疾病的化学疗法;没有或仅有很小的神经病(0级或1级)。意向性治疗人群包括104例(1:1)甲磺酸依立布林(1.4 mg / m 2 ,第1和第8天静脉注射2-5分钟)或ixabepilone(40 mg / m 2 ,在第1天的第3天静脉滴注,周期为21天。安全人群中的101名患者接受了5.0 eribulin和3.5 ixabepilone周期的中位数。 eribulin和ixabepilone的神经病变(任何等级)的发生率分别为33.3%和48.0%,周围神经病变的发生率分别为31.4和44.0%。在控制了先前存在的神经病变和先前化疗的次数后,这些差异并不明显。与ixabepilone相比,因神经病(3.9 vs. 18.0%)或不良事件(AEs)总体而言(11.8 vs.32.0%)停用eribulin的患者较少。 eribulin的神经病发作时间为35.9周,ixabepilone的神经病发作时间为11.6周,消退时间分别为48周和10周;其他AE具有可比性。客观反应为15.4对5.8%,临床受益率为26.9对19.2%。总之,在控制了先前存在的神经病变和先前化疗的次数后,艾立布林和依沙比比隆治疗神经病变的发生率差异无统计学意义。神经病的发作倾向于在较晚的时候使用eribulin发生并随后缓解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号