首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Clinical and Research Criteria for Developmental Coordination Disorder—Should They Be One and the Same?
【2h】

Clinical and Research Criteria for Developmental Coordination Disorder—Should They Be One and the Same?

机译:发育协调障碍的临床和研究标准—应当一视同仁吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this paper is to discuss if criteria used for diagnosing children for clinical purposes should be the same as for the selection of children with Developmental Coordination Disorder for research. Next, we give an overview of the criteria mentioned in the development of the European guideline for diagnosing Developmental Coordination Disorder and the implementation of this guideline in different countries. To gain insight into current clinical practice, we also reviewed the medical files of children attending rehabilitation centers for the criteria used to diagnose Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Netherlands. To conclude, we state our expert opinion on why and when research and clinical criteria for Developmental Coordination Disorder should or should not be the same.
机译:本文的目的是讨论用于临床目的诊断儿童的标准是否应与选择患有发展性协调障碍儿童进行研究的标准相同。接下来,我们概述了在诊断发展性协调障碍的欧洲指南以及在不同国家中实施该指南时提到的标准。为了深入了解当前的临床实践,我们还回顾了在康复中心就读的儿童的医疗档案,以寻找用于诊断荷兰发展性协调障碍的标准。最后,我们就为什么以及何时对发展性协调障碍的研究和临床标准应该或不应该相同的观点发表专家意见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号