首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Comparison between succinylcholine and rocuronium as neuromuscular blocking agents for electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with pseudocholinesterase deficiency
【2h】

Comparison between succinylcholine and rocuronium as neuromuscular blocking agents for electroconvulsive therapy in a patient with pseudocholinesterase deficiency

机译:丁二胆碱和罗库溴铵作为神经肌肉阻滞剂用于伪性胆碱酯酶缺乏症患者电惊厥治疗的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We report here the anesthetic management of a patient with schizophrenia and pseudocholinesterase deficiency. Electroconvulsive therapy was performed using succinylcholine and rocuronium as the neuromuscular blocking agents in the first seven and latter six treatments, respectively. The recovery time from muscle relaxation after succinylcholine administration was remarkably longer than that after rocuronium-sugammadex administration. Rocuronium and sugammadex appear to be useful in situations in which succinylcholine is contraindicated.
机译:我们在这里报告精神分裂症和假性胆碱酯酶缺乏症患者的麻醉管理。在前七个治疗和后六个治疗中,分别使用琥珀酰胆碱和罗库溴铵作为神经肌肉阻滞剂进行电抽搐治疗。琥珀酰胆碱给药后肌肉松弛的恢复时间明显比罗库溴铵-sugammadex给药后恢复的时间长。在禁忌使用琥珀酰胆碱的情况下,罗库溴铵和sugammadex似乎是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号