首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize
【2h】

Just a Cog in the Machine? The Individual Responsibility of Researchers in Nanotechnology is a Duty to Collectivize

机译:只是机器中的齿轮?纳米技术研究人员的个人责任是集体责任

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) provides a framework for judging the ethical qualities of innovation processes, however guidance for researchers on how to implement such practices is limited. Exploring RRI in the context of nanotechnology, this paper examines how the dispersed and interdisciplinary nature of the nanotechnology field somewhat hampers the abilities of individual researchers to control the innovation process. The ad-hoc nature of the field of nanotechnology, with its fluid boundaries and elusive membership, has thus far failed to establish a strong collective agent, such as a professional organization, through which researchers could collectively steer technological development in light of social and environmental needs. In this case, individual researchers cannot innovate responsibly purely by themselves, but there is also no structural framework to ensure that responsible development of nanotechnologies takes place. We argue that, in such a case, individual researchers have a duty to collectivize. In short, researchers in situations where it is challenging for individual agents to achieve the goals of RRI are compelled to develop organizations to facilitate RRI. In this paper we establish and discuss the criteria under which individual researchers have this duty to collectivize.
机译:负责任的研究与创新(RRI)提供了一个框架来判断创新过程的道德品质,但是对于研究人员如何实施此类实践的指导是有限的。在纳米技术的背景下探索RRI,本文研究了纳米技术领域的分散性和跨学科性质如何在某种程度上阻碍了各个研究人员控制创新过程的能力。迄今为止,由于纳米技术领域的特殊性质,具有可变的边界和难以捉摸的成员身份,因此未能建立强大的集体代理,例如专业组织,研究人员可以通过这种集体组织根据社会和环境共同指导技术发展需要。在这种情况下,单个研究人员无法独自进行负责任的创新,但是也没有结构性框架来确保负责任地发展纳米技术。我们认为,在这种情况下,个别研究人员有责任集体化。简而言之,在个体代理难以实现RRI目标的情况下,研究人员被迫发展组织来促进RRI。在本文中,我们建立并讨论了各个研究人员负有集体责任的标准。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号