首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Results from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion and Antisocial Behavior
【2h】

London Education and Inclusion Project (LEIP): Results from a Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Reduce School Exclusion and Antisocial Behavior

机译:伦敦教育与融合项目(LEIP):一项旨在减少学校排斥和反社会行为的干预措施的集群随机对照试验的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

School exclusion as a disciplinary measure remains a controversial issue. In spite of numerous attempts to reduce this practice, no solutions with documented effectiveness exist. This article reports results of a cluster-randomized controlled field trial carried out in 36 schools across London. The trial is an independent evaluation of a 12-week-long intervention, Engage in Education-London (EiE-L), delivered by Catch22. The intervention was aimed at students in secondary school who are most at risk of school exclusion. It targeted their social communication and broader social skills with the aim of reducing school exclusions and problem behaviors. The study employed a multi-informant design that included students and teacher reports as well as official records for exclusions and arrests. Data were analyzed through intent-to-treat analyses based on self-reports from 644 students and 685 teacher reports for students who were nominated for the study and for whom data was available at baseline or post-intervention. At baseline data collection the students ranged in age from 12.85 to 15.03, with M = 14.03; 71 % were male and included a number of ethnic minorities, the largest of which was black African/black Caribbean comprising 40 % of the sample. The results suggested a small but statistically significant negative effect on the primary outcome of exclusion and null effects for the secondary outcomes that measured behavioral and socio-emotional outcomes. The study’s findings are discussed in terms of the possible reasons for the null effects and negative (iatrogenic) effect.
机译:学校排斥作为一种纪律措施仍然是一个有争议的问题。尽管为减少这种做法进行了许多尝试,但尚无记录有效的解决方案。本文报告了在伦敦的36所学校中进行的集群随机对照试验的结果。该试验是对Catch22进行的为期12周的干预措施“伦敦教育参与(EiE-L)”的独立评估。这项干预措施针对的是中学中最容易被学校排斥的学生。它针对他们的社交交流和更广泛的社交技能,目的是减少学校的排斥和问题行为。该研究采用了一种多信息设计,包括学生和教师的报告以及正式的排除和逮捕记录。通过根据644名学生的自我报告和685名教师报告进行的意向性分析对数据进行了分析,这些数据来自被提名参加研究且在基线或干预后可获得数据的学生。在基线数据收集中,学生的年龄范围为12.85至15.03,M = 14.03; 71%是男性,包括许多少数民族,其中最大的是非洲黑人/加勒比海黑人,占样本的40%。结果表明,对排斥的主要结果有很小但具有统计学意义的负面影响,而对衡量行为和社会情感结果的次要结果则没有影响。根据无效效应和负(医源性)效应的可能原因,讨论了该研究的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号