首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Limit case analysis of the stable indenter velocity method for obtaining creep stress exponents from constant load indentation creep tests
【2h】

Limit case analysis of the stable indenter velocity method for obtaining creep stress exponents from constant load indentation creep tests

机译:从恒定载荷压痕蠕变测试获得蠕变应力指数的稳定压头速度方法的极限情况分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study concerns a commonly-used procedure for evaluating the steady state creep stress exponent, n, from indentation data. The procedure involves monitoring the indenter displacement history under constant load and making the assumption that, once its velocity has stabilised, the system is in a quasi-steady state, with stage II creep dominating the behaviour. The stress and strain fields under the indenter are represented by “equivalent stress” and “equivalent strain rate” values. The estimate of n is then obtained as the gradient of a plot of the logarithm of the equivalent strain rate against the logarithm of the equivalent stress. Concerns have, however, been expressed about the reliability of this procedure, and indeed it has already been shown to be fundamentally flawed. In the present paper, it is demonstrated, using a very simple analysis, that, for a genuinely stable velocity, the procedure always leads to the same, constant value for n (either 1.0 or 0.5, depending on whether the tip shape is spherical or self-similar). This occurs irrespective of the value of the measured velocity, or indeed of any creep characteristic of the material. It is now clear that previously-measured values of n, obtained using this procedure, have varied in a more or less random fashion, depending on the functional form chosen to represent the displacement–time history and the experimental variables (tip shape and size, penetration depth, etc.), with little or no sensitivity to the true value of n.
机译:这项研究涉及从压痕数据评估稳态蠕变应力指数n的常用程序。该过程包括在恒定负载下监视压头位移历史,并假设一旦其速度稳定,系统将处于准稳态,第二阶段蠕变将主导该行为。压头下的应力和应变场由“等效应力”和“等效应变率”值表示。然后,将n的估计值作为等效应变率的对数相对于等效应力的对数的图的梯度来获得。但是,人们对该程序的可靠性表示了担忧,实际上,它已经被证明存在根本缺陷。在本文中,通过非常简单的分析证明,对于真正稳定的速度,该过程始终会导致n的常数恒定(1.0或0.5,具体取决于尖端形状是球形还是球形)。自相似)。不管所测量的速度值,还是实际上材料的任何蠕变特性,都会发生这种情况。现在很明显,使用此程序获得的先前测量的n值或多或少地以随机方式变化,这取决于所选择的表示位移时程和实验变量(尖端形状和大小,穿透深度等),对n的真实值几乎没有或没有敏感度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号