首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Energy versus centrality dependence of the jet quenching parameter ... formula ... at RHIC and LHC: a new puzzle?
【2h】

Energy versus centrality dependence of the jet quenching parameter ... formula ... at RHIC and LHC: a new puzzle?

机译:RHIC和LHC的射流淬火参数...的能量与中心性的关系:一个新的难题?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The central goal of jet quenching studies in high-energy nuclear collisions is the characterization of those QCD medium properties that are accessible by these probes. Most of the discussion in the last years has been focused on the determination of the jet quenching parameter, q^. We present here an extraction of this parameter using data of inclusive particle suppression at RHIC and LHC energies for different centralities. Our approach consists in fitting a K factor that quantifies the departure of this parameter from an ideal estimate, Kq^/(2ϵ3/4), where q^ is determined by the local medium quantities as provided by hydrodynamical calculations. We find that this K factor is larger at RHIC than at the LHC, as obtained already in previous analyses, but, surprisingly, it is almost independent of the centrality of the collision. Taken at face value, the K factor would not depend on the local properties of the medium as energy density or temperature, but on global collision quantities such as the center of mass energy. This is a very intriguing, unexpected possibility for which we cannot yet provide a clear interpretation. We also comment on the limitations of the formalism that may affect this conclusion.
机译:高能核碰撞中喷射淬火研究的主要目标是表征这些探针可接近的QCD介质特性。近年来,大多数讨论都集中在确定喷射淬火参数上, q ^ 。我们在这里使用不同中心在RHIC和LHC能量下包含包容性粒子抑制的数据提取此参数。我们的方法包括拟合一个K因子,该因子量化此参数与理想估计值之间的偏差, K <移动者accent =“ true”> q ^ / 2 ϵ 3 / 4 < mo Stretchy =“ false”>) ,其中 <移动器重音=“ true”> q ^ 由水动力计算提供的本地介质量。我们发现,在RHIC处,该K因子要比在LHC处更大,如先前的分析中所述,但是令人惊讶的是,它几乎与碰撞的中心性无关。从表面价值来看,K因子将不取决于介质的局部特性(例如能量密度或温度),而是取决于整体碰撞量(例如质能中心)。这是一个非常有趣的,出乎意料的可能性,我们尚无法提供明确的解释。我们还评论了形式主义的局限性可能会影响这一结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号