首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Setting the Weights: The Women’s Capabilities Index for Malawi
【2h】

Setting the Weights: The Women’s Capabilities Index for Malawi

机译:设定权重:马拉维妇女能力指数

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Standard indicators of wellbeing such as the QALY for health and GDP per capita for economic development have been increasingly regarded as being too narrow in focus. There is a need to develop multidimensional measures of wellbeing that encompass the full range of factors that make life worth living. This study is part of a project that aims at developing a multidimensional index based on Sen’s capability framework to assess women’s wellbeing in rural Malawi: the Women's Capabilities Index. The project identifies a set of capabilities relevant to the context; proposes a methodology to measure robustly these capabilities; aggregates the capabilities into a single metric (index); and validates and tests the index. This paper focuses on the weighting and aggregation of the index. Four weighting methods of aggregation are chosen: two normative approaches; a data-driven approach; and a hybrid method. The different methods have implications on the results which are critically assessed and compared. This study contributes to the literature on the implications of adopting different methods for setting the weights in composite measures of wellbeing.
机译:人们日益认为,诸如健康的QALY和经济发展的人均GDP之类的福祉标准指标过于狭窄。有必要制定涵盖各种使生活变得有意义的各种因素的福祉的多维指标。这项研究是一个项目的一部分,该项目旨在根据森的能力框架来开发评估多维指标在马拉维农村地区妇女福祉的多维指数:妇女能力指数。该项目确定了与上下文相关的一组功能;提出了一种方法来稳健地衡量这些能力;将功能汇总到单个度量标准(索引)中;并验证和测试索引。本文着重于索引的加权和聚合。选择了四种加权方法:两种规范方法;数据驱动的方法;和混合方法。不同的方法会对结果进行评估,并严格评估和比较结果。这项研究为采用不同方法设定幸福感综合指标的权重的含义对文献做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号