首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Disagreement between the results from three commercial tests for the detection of Borrelia-specific serum antibodies in the Netherlands associated with antibiotic treatment for Lyme borreliosis: a retrospective study
【2h】

Disagreement between the results from three commercial tests for the detection of Borrelia-specific serum antibodies in the Netherlands associated with antibiotic treatment for Lyme borreliosis: a retrospective study

机译:一项回顾性研究:在荷兰进行的三种与抗生素治疗莱姆氏疏螺旋体病相关的用于检测鲍氏疏螺旋体特异性血清抗体的商业测试结果之间存在分歧

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis is challenging because of the often non-specific symptoms and persisting antibodies after infection. We investigated the diagnostic characteristics of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and an immunoblot for the detection of Borrelia-specific serum antibodies using different test strategies in individuals with and without antibiotic treatment for Lyme borreliosis. This retrospective study included healthy individuals, patients with active Lyme neuroborreliosis and patients treated for Lyme neuroborreliosis. Two ELISAs were compared: the C6 ELISA and the SERION ELISA. Equivocal and positive results were confirmed by immunoblot. We included 174 healthy individuals, of whom 27 (15.5%) were treated for Lyme borreliosis in the past, 36 patients were treated for Lyme neuroborreliosis and 27 patients had active Lyme neuroborreliosis. All the active Lyme neuroborreliosis patients were reactive in both ELISAs (100% sensitivity); less reactivity was seen in the other three groups (range 17.7% to 69.4%). The concordance between the ELISA results was high in active Lyme neuroborreliosis patients (26/27; 96.3%) and healthy individuals (131/147; 89.1%), but lower in treated healthy individuals (18/27; 66.7%) and treated Lyme neuroborreliosis patients (18/36; 50.0%) (p ≤ 0.005). This study showed that antibiotic treatment against Lyme borreliosis was strongly associated with discordant ELISA and test strategy results (odds ratio: 10.52; p < 0.001 and 9.98; p = 0.014, respectively) suggesting antibiotic treatment influences the pace at which the various antibodies directed to the different antigens used in both ELISAs wane. Among treated neuroborreliosis patients, the SERION ELISA stayed positive for a longer period after infection compared to the C6 ELISA. This should be taken into consideration when requesting and/or interpreting Lyme serology.
机译:由于感染后常常出现非特异性症状且抗体持续存在,因此莱姆病的诊断是具有挑战性的。我们调查了两种酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和一种免疫印迹的诊断特征,该免疫印迹用于使用不同的测试策略在有或没有针对莱姆病的抗生素治疗的个体中检测疏螺旋体特异性血清抗体。这项回顾性研究包括健康个体,患有活动性莱姆病的神经性贝氏体病的患者和接受过莱姆病的神经性贝氏体病的患者。比较了两种ELISA:C6 ELISA和SERION ELISA。免疫印迹证实了模棱两可和积极的结果。我们纳入了174名健康个体,其中27例(15.5%)过去曾接受过莱姆病的治疗,36例曾接受过莱姆病的治疗,27例患有活动性莱姆病。两种酶联免疫吸附试验均对所有活跃的莱姆神经支原体病患者具有反应性(100%敏感性)。其他三组的反应性较低(范围为17.7%至69.4%)。 ELISA结果之间的一致性在活跃的莱姆神经衰弱患者(26/27; 96.3%)和健康个体(131/147; 89.1%)中较高,但在治疗的健康个体(18/27; 66.7%)和治疗的莱姆中较低神经衰弱患者(18/36; 50.0%)(p≤0.005)。这项研究表明,针对莱姆病的抗生素治疗与不一致的ELISA和测试策略结果密切相关(比值比:分别为10.52; p <0.001和9.98; p = 0.014),表明抗生素治疗会影响针对不同抗体的反应速度两种ELISA中使用的不同抗原都消失了。与C6 ELISA相比,在接受治疗的神经性贝雷索病患者中,SERION ELISA在感染后可长期保持阳性。请求和/或解释莱姆血清学时应考虑到这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号