首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Performance of HADDOCK and a simple contact-based protein–ligand binding affinity predictor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2
【2h】

Performance of HADDOCK and a simple contact-based protein–ligand binding affinity predictor in the D3R Grand Challenge 2

机译:HADDOCK和简单的基于接触的蛋白质-配体结合亲和力预测因子在D3R Grand Challenge 2中的性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We present the performance of HADDOCK, our information-driven docking software, in the second edition of the D3R Grand Challenge. In this blind experiment, participants were requested to predict the structures and binding affinities of complexes between the Farnesoid X nuclear receptor and 102 different ligands. The models obtained in Stage1 with HADDOCK and ligand-specific protocol show an average ligand RMSD of 5.1 Å from the crystal structure. Only 6/35 targets were within 2.5 Å RMSD from the reference, which prompted us to investigate the limiting factors and revise our protocol for Stage2. The choice of the receptor conformation appeared to have the strongest influence on the results. Our Stage2 models were of higher quality (13 out of 35 were within 2.5 Å), with an average RMSD of 4.1 Å. The docking protocol was applied to all 102 ligands to generate poses for binding affinity prediction. We developed a modified version of our contact-based binding affinity predictor PRODIGY, using the number of interatomic contacts classified by their type and the intermolecular electrostatic energy. This simple structure-based binding affinity predictor shows a Kendall’s Tau correlation of 0.37 in ranking the ligands (7th best out of 77 methods, 5th/25 groups). Those results were obtained from the average prediction over the top10 poses, irrespective of their similarity/correctness, underscoring the robustness of our simple predictor. This results in an enrichment factor of 2.5 compared to a random predictor for ranking ligands within the top 25%, making it a promising approach to identify lead compounds in virtual screening.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10822-017-0049-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:在第二版D3R挑战赛中,我们介绍了信息驱动的对接软件HADDOCK的性能。在该盲实验中,要求参与者预测法呢类X核受体与102个不同配体之间复合物的结构和结合亲和力。在Stage1中使用HADDOCK和配体特异性方案获得的模型显示,晶体结构的平均配体RMSD为5.1Å。只有6/35个目标位于参考标准的2.5ÅRMSD之内,这促使我们研究限制因素并修订了Stage2的方案。受体构象的选择似乎对结果具有最强的影响。我们的Stage2模型质量更高(35个模型中有13个在2.5Å内),平均RMSD为4.1Å。将对接方案应用于所有102个配体,以产生用于结合亲和力预测的姿势。我们使用按类型和分子间静电能分类的原子间接触数,开发了基于接触的结合亲和力预测因子PRODIGY的改进版本。这种简单的基于结构的结合亲和力预测因子显示,在配体排名中,Kendall的Tau相关性为0.37(在77种方法中排名第7,第5/25组)。这些结果是从前10个姿势的平均预测中获得的,无论它们的相似性/正确性如何,都强调了我们简单预测器的鲁棒性。与随机预测变量相比,将富集因子排在前25%以内的结果是2.5。这使其成为在虚拟筛选中鉴定先导化合物的有前途的方法。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s10822- 017-0049-y)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号