首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations
【2h】

A systematic review assessing non-pharmacological conservative treatment studies for people with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain: clinical outcomes and research design considerations

机译:评估非炎性多关节痛患者的非药物保守治疗研究的系统评价:临床结果和研究设计注意事项

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To systematically review the evidence to determine the clinical outcomes and the important methodological quality features of interventional studies on adults with non-inflammatory multi-joint pain (MJP). Systematic search of published and unpublished literature using the databases: AMED, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, psycINFO, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, OpenGrey, the EU Clinical Trials Register, World Health Organization International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and the ISRCTN registry (search: inception to 19th October 2017). All papers reporting the clinical outcomes of non-pharmacological interventions for people with non-inflammatory MJP were included. Studies were critically appraised using the Downs and Black Critical Appraisal and the TIDieR reporting checklists. Data were analysed using a Best Evidence Synthesis approach. From 3824 citations, four papers satisfied the eligibility criteria. Three studies reported outcomes from multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes and one study reported the findings of a spa therapy intervention. All interventions significantly improved pain, function and quality of life in the short-term. There was limited reporting of measures for absenteeism, presenteeism and psychosocial outcomes. The evidence was ‘weak’, and due to a lack of controlled trials, there is limited evidence to ascertain treatment effectiveness. Design consideration for future trials surround improved reporting of participant characteristics, interventions and the standardisation of core outcome measures. There is insufficient high-quality trial data to determine the effectiveness of treatments for non-inflammatory MJP. Given the significant health burden which this condition presents on both individuals and wider society, developing and testing interventions and accurately reporting these, should be a research priority. Registration PROSPERO (CRD42013005888).
机译:为了系统地审查证据,以确定对成人非炎性多关节痛(MJP)进行干预研究的临床结果和重要的方法学质量特征。使用以下数据库系统搜索已发表和未发表的文献:AMED,CINAHL,MEDLINE,EMBASE,psycINFO,SPORTDiscus,PEDro,OpenGrey,欧盟临床试验注册,世界卫生组织国际临床试验注册平台,ClinicalTrials.gov和ISRCTN注册中心(搜索:成立至2017年10月19日)。包括所有报告非炎性MJP患者非药物干预临床结果的论文。使用Downs and Black关键评估和TIDieR报告核对表对研究进行了严格评估。使用最佳证据综合方法分析数据。从3824次引用中,有四篇论文符合资格标准。三项研究报告了多学科康复计划的结果,一项研究报告了水疗治疗干预的结果。所有的干预措施都可以在短期内显着改善疼痛,功能和生活质量。关于旷工,出席者和社会心理结果的措施的报道很少。证据是“弱”的,并且由于缺乏对照试验,因此确定治疗效果的证据有限。未来试验的设计考虑因素包括改进参与者特征,干预措施和核心结果指标标准化的报告。没有足够的高质量试验数据来确定非炎性MJP治疗的有效性。鉴于这种情况给个人和整个社会带来了巨大的健康负担,因此,开发和测试干预措施并准确报告这些措施应成为研究的重点。注册PROSPERO(CRD42013005888)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号