首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The experiences and beliefs of older people in Scottish very sheltered housing about using multi-compartment compliance aids
【2h】

The experiences and beliefs of older people in Scottish very sheltered housing about using multi-compartment compliance aids

机译:苏格兰老年人庇护所的经验和信仰有关使用多隔室合规性辅助工具

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Multi-compartment compliance aids (MCAs) are promoted as a potential solution to medicines non-adherence despite the absence of high quality evidence of effectiveness of MCA use impacting medicines adherence or any clinical outcomes. Furthermore, there is a lack of qualitative research which focuses on the perspectives of older people receiving MCAs. Objectives To describe experiences and beliefs surrounding very sheltered housing (VSH) residents’ use of MCAs with emphasis on issues of personalisation, reablement, shared decision-making, independence and support. Setting VSH in north east Scotland. Methods Qualitative, face-to-face interviews with 20 residents (≥ 65 years, using MCA > 6 months) in three VSH complexes. Interviews focused on: when and why the MCA was first introduced; who was involved in making that decision; how the MCA was used; perceptions of benefit; and any difficulties encountered. Interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed and analysed using a framework approach. Main outcome measure Experiences and beliefs surrounding use of MCAs. Results Nine themes were identified: shared decision-making; independence; knowledge and awareness of why MCA had been commenced; support in medicines taking; knowledge and awareness of medicines; competent and capable to manage medicines; social aspects of carers supporting MCA use; benefits of MCAs; and drawbacks. Conclusion Experiences and beliefs are diverse and highly individual, with themes identified aligning to key strategies and policies of the Scottish Government, and other developed countries around the world, specifically personalisation shared decision making, independence, reablement and support.
机译:背景技术尽管缺乏高质量的证据证明使用多氯联苯会影响药物的依从性或任何临床结果,但多室依从性辅助药物(MCA)仍被认为是解决药物不依从性的潜在解决方案。此外,缺乏定性研究,侧重于接受MCA的老年人的观点。目的描述围绕非常庇护性住房(VSH)居民使用MCA的经验和信念,重点是个性化,固定,共同决策,独立和支持等问题。在苏格兰东北部设置VSH。方法与三个VSH大楼中的20名居民(≥65岁,使用MCA> 6个月)进行定性面对面访谈。访谈的重点是:何时以及为何首次引入MCA;谁参与了该决定; MCA的使用方式;利益观;以及遇到的任何困难。使用框架方法对访谈进行录音,转录和分析。主要结果指标围绕使用MCA的经验和信念。结果确定了九个主题:共同决策独立;对为什么开始MCA的知识和意识;支持药物服用;对药物的了解和认识;有能力并且有能力管理药品;照顾者支持MCA使用的社会方面; MCA的好处;和缺点。结论经验和信念是多种多样的,并且高度个性化,确定的主题与苏格兰政府和世界其他发达国家的关键战略和政策相吻合,特别是个性化共享决策,独立性,保留和支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号