首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate
【2h】

Introduction: mapping the multiculturalism-interculturalism debate

机译:简介:绘制多元文化主义-跨文化主义辩论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since the 1970s multiculturalist policies that recognize and accommodate ethnocultural diversity have been implemented across western democracies. However, the tide seems to have changed: a ‘backlash against multiculturalism’ has been occurring since the 1990s. While it remains unclear whether this backlash is a matter of rhetoric or if there is indeed a wholesale retreat from multiculturalism, several scholars, politicians and journalists have invoked a pervasive narrative of the rise/advance and fall/retreat of multiculturalism. ‘Interculturalism’ has been introduced as a remedy, being allegedly well-suited to address some of the shortcomings of the multicultural approach. In this introduction to the Special Issue, which is about the key texts of Tariq Modood and Ricard Zapata Barrero, we present and question the nexus between the two terms. How has the ‘multiculturalism-interculturalism’ debate been held so far?
机译:自1970年代以来,承认和适应民族文化多样性的多元文化主义政策已在西方民主国家实施。但是,潮流似乎已经改变:自1990年代以来,就出现了“反对多元文化主义的强烈反对”。虽然目前尚不清楚这种反弹是否是言辞问题,还是确实确实从多元文化主义中撤退,但几位学者,政界人士和新闻工作者已经援引了关于多元文化主义兴衰/消退的普遍叙述。引入了“跨文化主义”作为一种补救措施,据称非常适合解决多元文化方法的一些缺点。在本期特刊的引言中,它涉及Tariq Modood和Ricard Zapata Barrero的关键文本,我们提出并质疑这两个术语之间的联系。迄今为止如何进行“多元文化主义-跨文化主义”辩论?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号