首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews
【2h】

Community pharmacists’ views of using a screening tool to structure medicines use reviews for older people: findings from qualitative interviews

机译:社区药剂师关于使用筛选工具来构建药物的观点对老年人的使用评论:定性访谈的发现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background The Medicines use review (MUR) service, provided by community pharmacists, seeks to optimise patients’ use of medicines. There is limited evidence on the clinical effectiveness of this service. Structuring MURs to include an assessment of prescribing appropriateness, facilitated by a validated prescribing screening tool, has the capacity to enhance this service. Objective To explore community pharmacists’ views on the facilitators and barriers towards the utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Setting Community Pharmacy, Northern Ireland. Method Using the 14 domain Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), semi-structured interviews were conducted with community pharmacists. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the Framework method. Main Outcome Measure Pharmacists’ views towards utilisation of a screening tool as a guide to conducting structured MURs. Results Based on the analysis of 15 interviews, 11 TDF domains (‘Knowledge’, ‘Skills’, ‘Social and professional role and identity’, ‘Beliefs about capabilities’, ‘Beliefs about consequences’, ‘Reinforcement’, ‘Goals’, ‘Memory, attention and decision process’, ‘Environmental context and resources’, ‘Social influences’, ‘Behavioural regulation’) were deemed relevant. Facilitators included: knowledge of patients, clinical knowledge, perceived professional role, patients’ clinical outcomes, influence of peers. Barriers included: prioritisation of other clinical activities, inability to access patients’ clinical information, perceived alienation from the primary healthcare team and staffing issues. Conclusions Using the TDF, key facilitators and barriers were identified in the use of a screening tool as a guide to conducting MURs. These findings may assist in further development of MURs as a means to optimise patients’ medicines use.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s11096-018-0659-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:背景技术社区药剂师提供的药品使用审查(MUR)服务旨在优化患者的药品使用情况。关于这项服务的临床有效性的证据有限。在经过验证的处方筛选工具的帮助下,将MUR进行结构化以包括对处方适当性的评估,能够增强这项服务。目的探讨社区药剂师对使用筛选工具作为进行结构化MUR的指南的促进因素和障碍的观点。设置社区药房,北爱尔兰。方法使用14个领域理论领域框架(TDF),与社区药剂师进行了半结构化访谈。对访谈进行数字记录,逐字记录并使用框架方法进行分析。主要结果衡量药剂师对使用筛选工具作为进行结构化MUR的指南的观点。结果基于对15个访谈的分析,11个TDF领域(“知识”,“技能”,“社会和专业角色和身份”,“对能力的信念”,“对后果的信念”,“强化”,“目标”, “记忆,注意和决策过程”,“环境和资源”,“社会影响力”,“行为法规”被认为是相关的。促进者包括:患者知识,临床知识,专业角色,患者的临床结果,同伴的影响。障碍包括:优先安排其他临床活动,无法访问患者的临床信息,被认为与主要医疗团队疏远以及人员配备问题。结论使用TDF,在使用筛查工具作为开展MUR的指南时,确定了关键的促进因素和障碍。这些发现可能有助于进一步开发MUR,以优化患者药物的使用。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1007 / s11096-018-0659-z)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号