首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications
【2h】

Multiple diversity concepts and their ethical-epistemic implications

机译:多重多样性概念及其伦理流行病学意义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A concept of diversity is an understanding of what makes a group diverse that may be applicable in a variety of contexts. We distinguish three diversity concepts, show that each can be found in discussions of diversity in science, and explain how they tend to be associated with distinct epistemic and ethical rationales. Yet philosophical literature on diversity among scientists has given little attention to distinct concepts of diversity. This is significant because the unappreciated existence of multiple diversity concepts can generate unclarity about the meaning of “diversity,” lead to problematic inferences from empirical research, and obscure complex ethical-epistemic questions about how to define diversity in specific cases. We illustrate some ethical-epistemic implications of our proposal by reference to an example of deliberative mini-publics on human tissue biobanking.
机译:多样性的概念是对使群体多样化的原因的理解,这些多样性可能适用于多种情况。我们区分了三种多样性概念,表明它们可以在科学多样性讨论中找到,并解释它们如何倾向于与独特的认识论和伦理学原理联系在一起。然而,关于科学家之间的多样性的哲学文献很少关注独特的多样性概念。这是很重要的,因为没有意识到多个多样性概念会导致人们对“多样性”的含糊不清,导致从实证研究中得出有问题的推论,并模糊了关于如何在特定情况下定义多样性的复杂的伦理学认识论问题。我们通过参考关于人体组织生物库的经过审议的小型公共机构的例子,说明了我们的提议的一些伦理学,流行病学意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号