首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Low CT temporal sampling rates result in a substantial underestimation of myocardial blood flow measurements
【2h】

Low CT temporal sampling rates result in a substantial underestimation of myocardial blood flow measurements

机译:低的CT时间采样率导致严重低估了心肌血流测量值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of temporal sampling rate in dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTMPI) on myocardial blood flow (MBF). Dynamic perfusion CT underestimates myocardial blood flow compared to PET and SPECT values. For accurate quantitative analysis of myocardial perfusion with dynamic perfusion CT a stable calibrated HU measurement of MBF is essential. Three porcine hearts were perfused using an ex-vivo Langendorff model. Hemodynamic parameters were monitored. Dynamic CTMPI was performed using third generation dual source CT at 70 kVp and 230–350 mAs/rot in electrocardiography(ECG)-triggered shuttle-mode (sampling rate, 1 acquisition every 2–3 s; z-range, 10.2 cm), ECG-triggered non-shuttle mode (fixed table position) with stationary tube rotation (1 acquisition every 0.5–1 s, 5.8 cm), and non-ECG-triggered continuous mode (1 acquisition every 0.06 s, 5.8 cm). Stenosis was created in the circumflex artery, inducing different fractional flow reserve values. Volume perfusion CT Myocardium software was used to analyze ECG-triggered scans. For the non-ECG triggered scans MASS research version was used combined with an in-house Matlab script. MBF (mL/g/min) was calculated for non-ischemic segments. True MBF was calculated using input flow and heart weight. Significant differences in MBF between shuttle, non-shuttle and continuous mode were found, with median MBF of 0.87 [interquartile range 0.72–1.00], 1.20 (1.07–1.30) and 1.65 (1.40–1.88), respectively. The median MBF in shuttle mode was 56% lower than the true MBF. In non-shuttle and continuous mode, the underestimation was 41% and 18%. Limited temporal sampling rate in standard dynamic CTMPI techniques contributes to substantial underestimation of true MBF.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估动态CT心肌灌注成像(CTMPI)的时间采样率对心肌血流量(MBF)的影响。与PET和SPECT值相比,动态灌注CT低估了心肌血流量。为了用动态灌注CT对心肌灌注进行准确的定量分析,必须稳定地校准MBF的HU测量值。使用离体Langendorff模型灌注三个猪心脏。监测血流动力学参数。动态CTMPI使用第三代双源CT在心电图(ECG)触发的穿梭模式下以70 kVp和230-350 mAs / rot的频率执行(采样率,每2-3 s采集一次; z范围10.2 cm), ECG触发的非穿梭模式(固定工作台位置),具有固定的管旋转(每0.5-1 s,5.8 cm采集1个)和非ECG触发的连续模式(每0.06 s,5.8 cm采集1个)。在回旋动脉中形成狭窄,从而导致不同的分流储备值。体积灌注CT心肌软件用于分析心电图触发的扫描。对于非ECG触发的扫描,将MASS研究版本与内部Matlab脚本结合使用。计算了非缺血性节段的MBF(mL / g / min)。使用输入流量和心脏重量计算真实的MBF。发现穿梭模式,非穿梭模式和连续模式之间的MBF显着差异,中位数MBF分别为0.87 [四分位数范围0.72–1.00],1.20(1.07–1.30)和1.65(1.40–1.88)。穿梭模式下的MBF中值比真实MBF低56%。在非穿梭和连续模式下,低估率为41%和18%。标准动态CTMPI技术中有限的时间采样率会导致对真实MBF的严重低估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号