首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Liminality in Ontario’s long-term care facilities: Private companions’ care work in the space ‘betwixt and between’
【2h】

Liminality in Ontario’s long-term care facilities: Private companions’ care work in the space ‘betwixt and between’

机译:安大略省长期护理机构中的刑法:私人同伴的护理工作在 betwixt and between空间中

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nursing, personal care, food and cleaning are publicly funded in Ontario’s long-term care facilities, but under-staffing usually renders all but the most basic of personal preferences superfluous. This individualization of responsibility for more personalized care has resulted in more families providing more care and opting to hire private, private companion care. With direct payment of companions becoming a growing but largely invisible facet of care, exploring companion’s roles is important. Using a six site rapid ethnographic study in long-term care facilities (i.e. observations, documents and key informant interviews (n = 167)), this paper argues that private companions occupy a liminal space between policy, family and market, and their role within institutions and in private homes may be the missing link in the care work chain in the sense that it can at once be classified as formal and informal and draws on their own and others paid and unpaid labour.
机译:护理,个人护理,食物和清洁费用是由安大略省的长期护理机构提供的公共资金,但人员配备不足通常会使除最基本的个人喜好外的所有人员都不必要。对个性化护理的责任的这种个性化导致更多家庭提供更多护理,并选择雇用私人,私人陪护。随着同伴的直接付款已成为越来越多但几乎看不见的护理方式,探索同伴的角色非常重要。本文在长期护理机构中进行了六点民族志快速研究(即观察,文件和主要知情人访谈(n = 167)),认为私人同伴在政策,家庭和市场及其在内部的作用之间占据着有限的空间。机构和私人住宅可能是护理工作链中缺失的环节,从某种意义上说,它可以立即分为正式和非正式的类别,并依靠自己和其他有偿和无偿劳动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号