首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >The Bio:Fiction film festival: Sensing how a debate about synthetic biology might evolve
【2h】

The Bio:Fiction film festival: Sensing how a debate about synthetic biology might evolve

机译:生物:小说电影节:感受关于合成生物学的辩论可能如何演变

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Synthetic biology (SB) is a new techno-scientific field surrounded by an aura of hope, hype and fear. Currently it is difficult to predict which way the public debate – and thus the social shaping of technology – is heading. With limited hard evidence at hand, we resort to a strategy that takes into account speculative design and diegetic prototyping, accessing the Bio:Fiction science film festival, and its 52 short films from international independent filmmakers. Our first hypothesis was that these films could be used as an indicator of a public debate to come. The second hypothesis was that SB would most likely not follow the debate around genetic engineering (framing technology as conflict) as assumed by many observers. Instead, we found good evidence for two alternative comparators, namely nanotechnology (technology as progress) and information technology (technology as gadget) as stronger attractors for an upcoming public debate on SB.
机译:合成生物学(SB)是一个充满希望,炒作和恐惧光环的新兴技术科学领域。当前,很难预测公众辩论的方向,进而也就无法预测技术的社会形态。在手头证据有限的情况下,我们采取了一种考虑投机性设计和原型制作原型的策略,参加了Bio:Fiction科学电影节以及来自国际独立电影制片人的52部短片。我们的第一个假设是,这些电影可以用作即将进行的公开辩论的指标。第二个假设是,SB极有可能不会像许多观察者所认为的那样,跟随围绕基因工程(将技术构筑为冲突)的辩论。相反,我们找到了两个替代比较器的有力证据,即纳米技术(作为进步的技术)和信息技术(作为小工具的技术)是即将举行的关于SB的公开辩论的更强吸引力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号