首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Helical and Static-port Tomotherapy Using the Newly-developed Dynamic Jaws Technology for Lung Cancer
【2h】

Helical and Static-port Tomotherapy Using the Newly-developed Dynamic Jaws Technology for Lung Cancer

机译:使用新开发的动态钳夹技术对肺癌进行螺旋和静态端口断层治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With the newly developed dynamic jaws technology, radiation dose for the cranio-caudal edges of a target can be lowered in the treatment with tomotherapy. We compared dynamic-jaw- and fixed-jaw-mode plans for lung cancer. In 35 patients, four plans using the 2.5-cm dynamic-, 2.5-cm fixed-, 5.0-cm dynamic-, and 5.0-cm fixed-jaw modes were generated. For 10 patients with upper lobe stage I lung cancer, the helical tomotherapy mode was used. Fifty-six Gy in 8 fractions was prescribed as a minimum coverage dose for 95% of the target (D95%). For 25 patients with locally advanced lung cancer, plans using four static ports (TomoDirect® mode) were made. Sixty Gy in 30 daily fractions for the primary tumor and swollen lymph nodes and 51 Gy in 30 fractions for prophylactic lymph node areas were prescribed as median doses. The mean conformity index of the planning target volume were similar among the four plans. The mean V5 Gy of the lung for 2.5-cm dynamic-, 2.5-cm fixed-, 5.0-cm dynamic-, and 5.0-cm fixed-jaw mode plans were 18.5%, 21.8%, 20.1%, and 29.4%, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with stage I lung cancer, and 37.3%, 38.7%, 40.4%, and 44.0%, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with locally advanced lung cancer. The mean V5 Gy of the whole body was 1,826, 2,143, 1,983, and 2,939 ml, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with stage I lung cancer and 4,849, 5,197, 5,220, and 6,154 ml, respectively (p < 0.0001), for patients with locally advanced lung cancer. Treatment time was reduced by 21-39% in 5.0-cm dynamic-jaw plans compared to 2.5-cm plans. Regarding dose distribution, 2.5-cm dynamic-jaw plans were the best, and 5.0-cm dynamic-jaw plans were comparable to 2.5-cm fixed-jaw plans with shorter treatment times. The dynamic-jaw mode should be used instead of the conventional fixed-jaw mode in tomotherapy for lung cancer.
机译:借助最新开发的动态颌骨技术,可以在断层治疗中降低目标物颅尾边缘的放射剂量。我们比较了动态下颌和固定下颌模式的肺癌计划。在35例患者中,生成了使用2.5厘米动态,2.5厘米固定,5.0厘米和5.0厘米固定下颌模式的四个计划。对于10名上叶I期肺癌患者,采用了螺旋体层扫描疗法。规定将8馏分中的56 Gy作为95%目标(D95%)的最小覆盖剂量。对于25位局部晚期肺癌患者,制定了使用四个静态端口(TomoDirect®模式)的计划。对于原发性肿瘤和淋巴结肿大,每天30次的60 Gy,对于预防性淋巴结区域,每天30次的51 Gy被规定为中位剂量。在四个计划中,计划目标量的平均合格指数相似。 2.5厘米动态,2.5厘米固定,5.0厘米动态和5.0厘米固定下颌模式计划的肺部平均V5 Gy分别为18.5%,21.8%,20.1%和29.4% (p <0.0001),对于I期肺癌患者,局部晚期肺癌的患者分别为37.3%,38.7%,40.4%和44.0%(p <0.0001)。患有I期肺癌的患者的全身平均V5 Gy分别为1,826、2,143、1,983和2,939 ml(p <0.0001),分别为4,849、5,197、5,220和6,154 ml(p <0.0001) ,适用于患有局部晚期肺癌的患者。 5.0厘米动颚计划的治疗时间比2.5厘米计划减少了21-39%。就剂量分布而言,最佳方案是2.5厘米动态下颌计划,而5.0厘米动态下颌计划与治疗时间较短的2.5厘米固定下颌计划相当。在肺癌的tomotherapy中,应使用动态钳模式代替常规的固定钳模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号