首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Quality in Health Care : QHC >Awareness and analysis of a significant event by general practitioners: a cross sectional survey
【2h】

Awareness and analysis of a significant event by general practitioners: a cross sectional survey

机译:全科医生对重大事件的意识和分析:横断面调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: To determine the extent to which general practitioners (GPs) were aware of a recent significant event and whether a structured analysis of this event was undertaken to minimise the perceived risk of recurrence. >Design: Cross sectional survey using a postal questionnaire. >Setting: Greater Glasgow primary care trust. >Participants: 466 principals in general practice from 188 surgeries. >Main outcome measures: GPs' self-reported personal and practice characteristics, awareness of a recent significant event, participation in the structured analysis of the identified significant event, perceived chance of recurrence, forums for discussing and analysing significant events, and levels of primary care team involvement. >Results: Four hundred and sixty six GPs (76%) responded to the survey. GPs from single handed practices were less likely to respond than those in multi-partner training and non-training practices. 401 (86%) reported being aware of a recent significant event; lack of awareness was clearly associated with GPs from non-training practices. 219 (55%) had performed all the necessary stages of a structured analysis (as determined by the authors) of the significant event. GPs from training practices were more likely to report participation in the structured analysis of the recent event, to perceive the chance of this event recurring as "nil" or "very low", and to report significant event discussions taking place. >Conclusions: Most GPs were aware of a recent significant event and participated in the structured analysis of this event. The wider primary care team participated in the analysis process where GPs considered this involvement relevant. There is variation in the depth of and approach to significant event analysis within general practice, which may have implications for the application of the technique as part of the NHS quality agenda.
机译:>目标:确定全科医生(GPs)对最近一次重大事件的了解程度,以及是否对该事件进行了结构化分析以最大程度地降低复发风险。 >设计:使用邮政问卷的横断面调查。 >设置:大格拉斯哥初级保健信托。 >参与者:来自188个外科手术的466位一般负责人。 >主要结果指标:全科医生的自我报告的个人和实践特征,对最近发生的重大事件的认识,对已确定的重大事件的结构化分析的参与,感知的复发机会,讨论和分析重大事件的论坛事件以及基层医疗团队的参与程度。 >结果:466位全科医生(76%)回答了该调查。与多伙伴培训和非培训实践相比,单手实践的GP响应的可能性较小。 401名(86%)报告知道最近的重大事件;缺乏意识显然与非培训实践中的全科医生有关。 219(55%)人对重要事件进行了结构分析(由作者确定)的所有必要阶段。来自培训实践的GP更有可能报告参与最近事件的结构化分析,认为此事件再次发生的可能性为“零”或“非常低”,并报告正在进行的重要事件讨论。 >结论:大多数GP都知道最近发生的重大事件,并参与了对该事件的结构化分析。更广泛的初级保健团队参加了分析过程,全科医生认为这种参与是相关的。在一般实践中,重大事件分析的深度和方法各不相同,这可能对该技术作为NHS质量议程的一部分的应用产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号