首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Quality in Health Care : QHC >Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit*
【2h】

Effect of a scoring system and protocol for sedation on duration of patients need for ventilator support in a surgical intensive care unit*

机译:镇静评分系统和方案对外科重症监护病房患者需要呼吸机支持的持续时间的影响*

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要



>Problem: Need for improved sedation strategy for adults receiving ventilator support. >Design: Observational study of effect of introduction of guidelines to improve the doctors' and nurses' performance. The project was a prospective improvement and was part of a national quality improvement collaborative. >Background and setting: A general mixed surgical intensive care unit in a university hospital; all doctors and nurses in the unit; all adult patients (>18 years) treated by intermittent positive pressure ventilation for more than 24 hours. >Key measures for improvement: Reduction in patients' mean time on a ventilator and length of stay in intensive care over a period of 11 months; anonymous reporting of critical incidents; staff perceptions of ease and of consequences of changes. >Strategies for change: Multiple measures (protocol development, educational presentations, written guidelines, posters, flyers, emails, personal discussions, and continuous feedback) were tested, rapidly assessed, and adopted if beneficial. >Effects of change: Mean ventilator time decreased by 2.1 days (95% confidence interval 0.7 to 3.6 days) from 7.4 days before intervention to 5.3 days after. Mean stay decreased by 1.0 day (–0.9 to 2.9 days) from 9.3 days to 8.3 days. No accidental extubations or other incidents were identified. >Lessons learnt: Relatively simple changes in sedation practice had significant effects on length of ventilator support. The change process was well received by the staff and increased their interest in identifying other areas for improvement.
机译:

>问题:对于接受呼吸机支持的成年人,需要改进镇静策略。 >设计:对引入指南以改善医生和护士绩效的效果进行观察性研究。该项目是一项预期的改进,是国家质量改进合作计划的一部分。 >背景和背景:大学医院中的普通混合外科重症监护室;该单位的所有医生和护士;所有成年患者(> 18岁)均接受间歇性正压通气治疗超过24小时。 >主要改善措施:减少患者使用呼吸机的平均时间和在11个月内重症监护病房的住院时间;匿名报告重大事件;员工对轻松和变化后果的看法。 >变革策略:测试,快速评估并采取了多种措施(协议开发,教育演讲,书面指导方针,海报,传单,电子邮件,个人讨论和持续反馈),如果有好处,可以采用。 >变化的影响:平均呼吸机时间从干预前的7.4天减少到5.3天,减少了2.1天(95%置信区间0.7到3.6天)。平均停留时间从9.3天减少到8.3天,减少了1.0天(从0.9减少到2.9天)。没有发现意外拔管或其他事件。 >经验教训:镇静实践中相对简单的改变对呼吸机支持时间的长短有重大影响。员工对变更过程很满意,并增加了他们对寻找其他需要改进的领域的兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号