首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Computational Biology >Epidemiological and economic impact of pandemic influenza in Chicago: Priorities for vaccine interventions
【2h】

Epidemiological and economic impact of pandemic influenza in Chicago: Priorities for vaccine interventions

机译:芝加哥大流行性流感的流行病学和经济影响:疫苗干预措施的重点

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The study objective is to estimate the epidemiological and economic impact of vaccine interventions during influenza pandemics in Chicago, and assist in vaccine intervention priorities. Scenarios of delay in vaccine introduction with limited vaccine efficacy and limited supplies are not unlikely in future influenza pandemics, as in the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic. We simulated influenza pandemics in Chicago using agent-based transmission dynamic modeling. Population was distributed among high-risk and non-high risk among 0–19, 20–64 and 65+ years subpopulations. Different attack rate scenarios for catastrophic (30.15%), strong (21.96%), and moderate (11.73%) influenza pandemics were compared against vaccine intervention scenarios, at 40% coverage, 40% efficacy, and unit cost of $28.62. Sensitivity analysis for vaccine compliance, vaccine efficacy and vaccine start date was also conducted. Vaccine prioritization criteria include risk of death, total deaths, net benefits, and return on investment. The risk of death is the highest among the high-risk 65+ years subpopulation in the catastrophic influenza pandemic, and highest among the high-risk 0–19 years subpopulation in the strong and moderate influenza pandemics. The proportion of total deaths and net benefits are the highest among the high-risk 20–64 years subpopulation in the catastrophic, strong and moderate influenza pandemics. The return on investment is the highest in the high-risk 0–19 years subpopulation in the catastrophic, strong and moderate influenza pandemics. Based on risk of death and return on investment, high-risk groups of the three age group subpopulations can be prioritized for vaccination, and the vaccine interventions are cost saving for all age and risk groups. The attack rates among the children are higher than among the adults and seniors in the catastrophic, strong, and moderate influenza pandemic scenarios, due to their larger social contact network and homophilous interactions in school. Based on return on investment and higher attack rates among children, we recommend prioritizing children (0–19 years) and seniors (65+ years) after high-risk groups for influenza vaccination during times of limited vaccine supplies. Based on risk of death, we recommend prioritizing seniors (65+ years) after high-risk groups for influenza vaccination during times of limited vaccine supplies.
机译:研究目的是评估芝加哥流感大流行期间疫苗干预措施的流行病学和经济影响,并协助制定疫苗干预措施的重点。像2009年H1N1流感大流行一样,在未来的流感大流行中,疫苗效力有限,供应有限的情况下,推迟引入疫苗的情况并非不可能。我们使用基于代理的传播动态模型在芝加哥模拟了流感大流行。人口分布在0-19岁,20-64岁和65岁以上的亚人群中的高危和非高危人群中。将灾难性(30.15%),强(21.96%)和中度(11.73%)流感大流行的不同攻击率方案与疫苗干预方案进行了比较,覆盖率为40%,功效为40%,单位成本为28.62美元。还进行了疫苗依从性,疫苗功效和疫苗开始日期的敏感性分析。疫苗优先排序标准包括死亡风险,总死亡人数,净收益和投资回报率。在灾难性流感大流行的高风险65岁以上亚人群中,死亡风险最高,而在强和中等流感大流行中,在0至19岁高风险亚人群中最高。在灾难性,强和中度流感大流行中,高死亡率的20-64岁亚人群中,总死亡人数和净收益比例最高。在灾难性,强烈和中度流感大流行中,高风险的0-19岁人口中的投资回报率最高。根据死亡风险和投资回报率,可以优先考虑三个年龄组亚人群的高风险人群进行疫苗接种,并且疫苗干预措施可以节省所有年龄和风险人群的成本。在大流行,强和中度流感大流行的情况下,由于儿童更大的社交网络和学校中的友好互动,儿童的袭击率高于成人和老年人。根据儿童的投资回报率和较高的发病率,我们建议在疫苗供应有限时,将高风险人群之后的儿童(0-19岁)和老年人(65岁以上)放在优先位置。根据死亡风险,我们建议在疫苗供应有限时,高危人群之后的老年人(65岁以上)优先进行流感疫苗接种。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号