首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score
【2h】

Predicting mortality in patients with suspected sepsis at the Emergency Department; A retrospective cohort study comparing qSOFA, SIRS and National Early Warning Score

机译:在急诊科预测可疑败血症患者的死亡率;一项回顾性队列研究,比较了qSOFA,SIRS和国家早期预警得分

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

ObjectiveIn hospitalized patients, the risk of sepsis-related mortality can be assessed using the quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA). Currently, different tools that predict deterioration such as the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) have been introduced in clinical practice in Emergency Departments (ED) worldwide. It remains ambiguous which screening tool for mortality at the ED is best. The objective of this study was to evaluate the predictive performance for mortality of two sepsis-based scores (i.e. qSOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)-criteria) compared to the more general NEWS score, in patients with suspected infection directly at presentation to the ED.
机译:目的在住院患者中,可以使用快速败血症相关器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)来评估败血症相关死亡的风险。当前,全球急诊室(ED)的临床实践中已经引入了诸如国家早期预警评分(NEWS)之类的预测恶化的工具。对于急诊室中哪种死亡率最好的筛查工具仍然是模棱两可的。这项研究的目的是评估与怀疑的感染直接相关的两种基于败血症的评分(即qSOFA和全身性炎症反应综合征(SIRS)-标准)与更一般的NEWS评分相比对死亡率的预测性能。 ED。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号