首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Human resource primacy, dispositional optimism, and chest pain: A prospective, cross-lagged study of work, personality, and health
【2h】

Human resource primacy, dispositional optimism, and chest pain: A prospective, cross-lagged study of work, personality, and health

机译:人力资源至上,性格乐观和胸痛:对工作,个性和健康的前瞻性,交叉研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Chest pain (CP) is common, frightening, and often medically unexplained. Occupational psychological factors are associated with somatic pain. Personality may influence both perceived working conditions and somatic health, thereby confounding associations of work with health. Despite this, very few studies have investigated the interplay between work factors, personality and pain. The current study assessed relationships of a relatively novel work factor, human resource primacy (HRP), and a personality factor known to be relevant to health, dispositional optimism (Opt), with CP across two years (N = 6714). A series of structural equation models (SEMs) were fitted, modeling “substantive” and “confounded” relationships of psychological factors with CP. A “common latent factor” (CLF) was included to account for bias by unmeasured factors that may have influenced all variables (e.g. reporting bias) and the role of optimism as a possible confounder of the relationship between HRP and CP was investigated specifically. Independent effects of HRP and Opt on CP were observed. No effects of HRP/CP on Opt were observed. Opt appeared to confound the relationship between HRP and CP to some extent. However, best fit was observed for a “reciprocal” model with independent lagged effects from HRP/Opt to CP as well as from CP/Opt to HRP. Thus, results suggested a mutual causal dynamic between HRP and CP along with an influence of Opt on both HRP and CP—implying that working conditions influence the experience of chest pain while the chest pain also influences the experience of working conditions. Optimistic dispositions may influence the experience of both work and pain, but not to an extent that fully explains their relationship. Hence, the notion that associations of HRP with CP are mere artifacts of optimistic/pessimistic reporting was not supported. More likely, complex reciprocal relationships exist between these factors, in which mutual reinforcements occur and both vicious and virtuous cycles may result.
机译:胸痛(CP)是常见的,令人恐惧的,并且在医学上常常是无法解释的。职业心理因素与躯体疼痛有关。人格可能会影响感知的工作条件和身体健康,从而使工作与健康之间的联系混淆。尽管如此,很少有研究调查工作因素,性格和痛苦之间的相互作用。本研究评估了相对新颖的工作因素,人力资源至上(HRP)和已知与健康有关的人格因素,性格乐观(Opt)与CP的关系(N = 6714)。拟合了一系列结构方程模型(SEM),模拟了心理因素与CP的“实质性”和“混淆性”关系。包括“共同潜在因素”(CLF),以解释可能影响所有变量的不可衡量因素(例如报告偏见)造成的偏见,并特别研究了乐观主义作为HRP和CP关系的可能混杂因素的作用。观察到HRP和Opt对CP的独立影响。没有观察到HRP / CP对Opt的影响。 Opt似乎在某种程度上混淆了HRP和CP之间的关系。但是,对于“互惠”模型,从HRP / Opt到CP以及从CP / Opt到HRP具有独立的滞后效应,观察到了最佳拟合。因此,结果表明HRP和CP之间存在相互因果关系,以及Opt对HRP和CP的影响-暗示工作条件会影响胸痛的体验,而胸痛也会影响工作条件的体验。乐观的性格可能会影响工作和痛苦的经历,但不会在一定程度上影响他们的关系。因此,不支持将HRP与CP关联仅仅是乐观/悲观报告的产物的观点。这些因素之间更可能存在复杂的互惠关系,在这种相互关系中会发生相互强化,并可能导致恶性循环和良性循环。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号