首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Modeling user rating preference behavior to improve the performance of the collaborative filtering based recommender systems
【2h】

Modeling user rating preference behavior to improve the performance of the collaborative filtering based recommender systems

机译:对用户评级偏好行为进行建模,以提高基于协作过滤的推荐系统的性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One of the main concerns for online shopping websites is to provide efficient and customized recommendations to a very large number of users based on their preferences. Collaborative filtering (CF) is the most famous type of recommender system method to provide personalized recommendations to users. CF generates recommendations by identifying clusters of similar users or items from the user-item rating matrix. This cluster of similar users or items is generally identified by using some similarity measurement method. Among numerous proposed similarity measure methods by researchers, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) is a commonly used similarity measure method for CF-based recommender systems. The standard PCC suffers some inherent limitations and ignores user rating preference behavior (RPB). Typically, users have different RPB, where some users may give the same rating to various items without liking the items and some users may tend to give average rating albeit liking the items. Traditional similarity measure methods (including PCC) do not consider this rating pattern of users. In this article, we present a novel similarity measure method to consider user RPB while calculating similarity among users. The proposed similarity measure method state user RPB as a function of user average rating value, and variance or standard deviation. The user RPB is then combined with an improved model of standard PCC to form an improved similarity measure method for CF-based recommender systems. The proposed similarity measure is named as improved PCC weighted with RPB (IPWR). The qualitative and quantitative analysis of the IPWR similarity measure method is performed using five state-of-the-art datasets (i.e. Epinions, MovieLens-100K, MovieLens-1M, CiaoDVD, and MovieTweetings). The IPWR similarity measure method performs better than state-of-the-art similarity measure methods in terms of mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), precision, recall, and F-measure.
机译:在线购物网站的主要问题之一是根据大量用户的偏好向他们提供有效的定制化建议。协作过滤(CF)是最著名的推荐系统方法,可为用户提供个性化推荐。 CF通过从用户项目评级矩阵中识别相似用户或项目的集群来生成建议。通常,通过使用某种相似性度量方法来识别相似用户或项目的集群。在研究人员提出的众多相似度测量方法中,Pearson相关系数(PCC)是基于CF的推荐系统常用的相似度测量方法。标准PCC具有一些固有的局限性,并且忽略了用户评级偏好行为(RPB)。通常,用户具有不同的RPB,其中一些用户可能对各种项目给予相同的评分,而不会喜欢这些项目,而某些用户可能会倾向于给出平均评分,尽管他们喜欢这些项目。传统的相似性度量方法(包括PCC)不考虑用户的这种评级模式。在本文中,我们提出了一种新颖的相似性度量方法,用于在计算用户之间的相似性时考虑用户RPB。所提出的相似性度量方法将状态用户RPB定义为用户平均评级值以及方差或标准差的函数。然后,将用户RPB与标准PCC的改进模型组合在一起,以形成基于CF推荐系统的改进的相似性度量方法。拟议的相似性度量被称为通过RPB加权的改进PCC(IPWR)。使用五个最新数据集(即Epinions,MovieLens-100K,MovieLens-1M,CiaoDVD和MovieTweetings)对IPWR相似性度量方法进行了定性和定量分析。在平均绝对误差(MAE),均方根误差(RMSE),精度,召回率和F度量方面,IPWR相似性度量方法的性能优于最新的相似性度量方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号