首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Post-activation potentiation effect of eccentric overload and traditional weightlifting exercise on jumping and sprinting performance in male athletes
【2h】

Post-activation potentiation effect of eccentric overload and traditional weightlifting exercise on jumping and sprinting performance in male athletes

机译:偏心超负荷和传统的举重运动对男性运动员跳跳和冲刺成绩的激活后增强作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the post-activation potentiation (PAP) effects following eccentric overload (EOL) and traditional weightlifting (TW) exercise on standing long jump (SLJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), and 5 m sprint acceleration performance. Ten male athletes were involved in a randomized, crossover study. The subjects performed 3 sets of 6 repetitions of EOL or TW half squat exercise followed by SLJ, CMJ, and 5 m sprint tests at 1 min, 3 min and 7 min, in separate sessions using a randomized order. Bayes factor (BF10) was reported to show the strength of the evidence. Differences were found using EOL for SLJ distance at 3 min (BF10 = 7.24, +8%), and 7 min (BF10 = 19.5, +7%), for CMJ at 3 min (BF10 = 3.25, +9%), and 7 min (BF10 = 4.12, +10.5%). Differences were found using TW exercise for SLJ at 3 min (BF10 = 3.88, +9%), and 7 min (BF10 = 12.4, +9%), CMJ at 3 min (BF10 = 7.42, +9.5%), and 7 min (BF10 = 12.4, +12%). No meaningful differences were found between EOL and TW exercises for SLJ (BF10 = 0.33), CMJ (BF10 = 0.27), and 5 m sprint (BF10 = 0.22). In conclusion, EOL and TW exercises acutely increase SLJ and CMJ, but not 5 m sprint performance. The PAP time window was found between 3 min and 7 min using both protocols. This study did not find differences between EOL and TW exercises, and so both methodologies can be used to stimulate a PAP response.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估偏心超负荷(EOL)和传统举重(TW)练习对立定跳远(SLJ),后向运动跳跃(CMJ)和5 m短跑加速性能后的激活后增强(PAP)效果。十名男运动员参与了一项随机,交叉研究。受试者在1分钟,3分钟和7分钟分别按照随机顺序进行3组EOL或TW半深蹲运动的6次重复训练,然后分别进行SLJ,CMJ和5 m冲刺测试。据报道,贝叶斯因子(BF10)显示了有力的证据。使用EOL在3分钟(BF10 = 7.24,+ 8%)和7分钟(BF10 = 19.5,+ 7%)的SLJ距离上发现了差异,对于CMJ在3分钟(BF10 = 3.25,+ 9%)和7分钟(BF10 = 4.12,+ 10.5%)。使用TW锻炼在3分钟(BF10 = 3.88,+ 9%)和7分钟(BF10 = 12.4,+9%),3分钟(BF10 = 7.42,+ 9.5%)和7的CMJ中发现差异分钟(BF10 = 12.4,+ 12%)。在SLJ(BF10 = 0.33),CMJ(BF10 = 0.27)和5 m冲刺(BF10 = 0.22)的EOL和TW练习之间没有发现有意义的差异。总之,EOL和TW练习可显着提高SLJ和CMJ,但不会提高5 m的短跑成绩。使用这两种协议在3分钟到7分钟之间发现了PAP时间窗口。这项研究没有发现EOL和TW锻炼之间的差异,因此这两种方法均可用于刺激PAP反应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号