首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Distinguishing mild cognitive impairment from healthy aging and Alzheimer’s Disease: The contribution of the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS)
【2h】

Distinguishing mild cognitive impairment from healthy aging and Alzheimer’s Disease: The contribution of the INECO Frontal Screening (IFS)

机译:从健康的衰老和阿尔茨海默氏病中区分轻度认知障碍:INECO正面筛查(IFS)的贡献

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Executive functions are affected differently in healthy aging, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), and evaluating them is important for differential diagnosis. The INECO Frontal Screening (IFS) is a brief neuropsychological screening tool, developed to assess executive dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders. Goals: We aimed to examine whether and how MCI patients can be differentiated from cognitively healthy controls (HC) and mild to moderate AD patients based on IFS performance. We also explored how IFS scores are associated with age, years of education, and depressive/anxious symptoms (as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). Method: IFS total scores were compared between 26 HC, 32 MCI and 21 mild to moderate AD patients. The three groups were matched for age and education. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) was analyzed and optimal cut-offs were determined. Results: Healthy participants had higher IFS scores than both clinical groups, and MCI patients had higher scores than AD patients. IFS showed high diagnostic accuracy for the detection of MCI (AUC = .89, p < .001) and AD (AUC = .99, p < .001), and for the differentiation between the clinical groups (AUC = .76, p < .001). We provide optimal cut-offs for the identification of MCI and AD and for their differentiation. We also found that, in general, higher education predicted higher IFS scores (no associations with age and depressive/anxious symptoms were observed). Altogether, these findings indicate that evaluating executive functions with the IFS can be valuable for the identification of MCI, a high-risk group for dementia, and for differentiating this condition from healthy aging and AD.
机译:在健康的衰老,轻度认知障碍(MCI)和阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)中,执行功能受到不同的影响,对其进行评估对于鉴别诊断很重要。 INECO额叶筛查(IFS)是一种简短的神经心理学筛查工具,旨在评估神经退行性疾病中的执行功能障碍。目标:我们旨在根据IFS表现,检查是否可以将MCI患者与认知健康对照(HC)和轻度至中度AD患者区分开。我们还探讨了IFS评分与年龄,受教育年限以及抑郁/焦虑症状(通过医院焦虑和抑郁量表评估)之间的关系。方法:比较26例HC,32例MCI和21例轻至中度AD患者的IFS总评分。这三个组的年龄和文化程度相匹配。分析曲线下面积(AUC)并确定最佳截止值。结果:健康参与者的IFS得​​分均高于两个临床组,MCI患者的得分高于AD患者。 IFS对MCI(AUC = .89,p <.001)和AD(AUC = .99,p <.001)以及临床组之间的区分(AUC = .76,p <.001)。我们为MCI和AD的识别及其区分提供了最佳的临界值。我们还发现,一般而言,高等教育可以预测更高的IFS分数(未观察到与年龄和抑郁/焦虑症状的关联)。总而言之,这些发现表明,使用IFS评估执行功能对于识别MCI(痴呆症的高危人群)以及将这种状况与健康的衰老和AD进行区分具有重要的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号