首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >What is the optimum time for initiation of early mobilization in mechanically ventilated patients? A network meta-analysis
【2h】

What is the optimum time for initiation of early mobilization in mechanically ventilated patients? A network meta-analysis

机译:机械通气患者开始进行早期运动的最佳时间是什么?网络荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Early mobilization has been proven to be an effective and safe intervention for preventing complications in mechanically ventilated patients; however, there is currently no unified definition of the optimal mobilization initiation time, hindering widespread clinical implementation. As clinicians are increasingly aware of the benefits of early mobilization, the definition of early mobilization is important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of different early mobilization initiation times on mechanically ventilated patients and rank these times for practical consideration. The Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, the Chinese Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases, along with grey literature and reference lists, were searched for randomized control trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of early mobilization for improving patient outcomes; databases were searched from inception to October 2018. Two authors extracted data independently, using a predesigned Excel form, and assessed the quality of included RCTs according to the Cochrane Handbook (v5.1.0). Data were analyzed using Stata (v13.0) and Review Manager (v5.3.0). A total of 15 RCTs involving 1726 patients and seven mobilization initiation times (which were all compared to usual care) were included in our analysis. Network meta-analysis showed that mechanical ventilation for 48–72 h may be optimal to improve intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICU-AW) and reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation; however, there were no significant differences in length of ICU stay according to mobilization initiation time. The results of this study indicate that initiation of mobilization within 48–72 h of mechanical ventilation may be optimal for improving clinical outcomes for mechanically ventilated patients.
机译:事实证明,早期动员是预防机械通气患者并发症的有效且安全的干预措施。然而,目前尚无关于最佳动员起始时间的统一定义,这阻碍了广泛的临床实施。随着临床医生越来越意识到早期动员的好处,早期动员的定义很重要。这项研究的目的是评估不同的早期动员开始时间对机械通气患者的影响,并对这些时间进行排序以供实际考虑。搜索中国生物医学文献数据库,中国知识基础设施,万方数据,PubMed,Cochrane图书馆,Web of Science和Embase数据库,以及灰色文献和参考文献清单,以寻找可评估早期疗效的随机对照试验(RCT)。动员改善患者预后;从开始到2018年10月,对数据库进行了搜索。两位作者使用预先设计的Excel表格独立提取了数据,并根据Cochrane手册(v5.1.0)评估了所包含RCT的质量。使用Stata(v13.0)和Review Manager(v5.3.0)分析数据。我们的分析共包括15项RCT,涉及1726名患者和7次动员开始时间(均与常规护理相比)。网络荟萃分析显示,机械通气48-72小时可能是改善重症监护病房后天性无力(ICU-AW)和减少机械通气时间的最佳选择。然而,根据动员开始时间,ICU住院时间的长短没有显着差异。这项研究的结果表明,在机械通气的48-72小时内开始动员可能是改善机械通气患者临床效果的最佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号