首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >A citizen science based survey method for estimating the density of urban carnivores
【2h】

A citizen science based survey method for estimating the density of urban carnivores

机译:基于市民科学的估计城市食肉动物密度的调查方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Globally there are many examples of synanthropic carnivores exploiting growth in urbanisation. As carnivores can come into conflict with humans and are potential vectors of zoonotic disease, assessing densities in suburban areas and identifying factors that influence them are necessary to aid management and mitigation. However, fragmented, privately owned land restricts the use of conventional carnivore surveying techniques in these areas, requiring development of novel methods. We present a method that combines questionnaire distribution to residents with field surveys and GIS, to determine relative density of two urban carnivores in England, Great Britain. We determined the density of: red fox (Vulpes vulpes) social groups in 14, approximately 1km2 suburban areas in 8 different towns and cities; and Eurasian badger (Meles meles) social groups in three suburban areas of one city. Average relative fox group density (FGD) was 3.72 km-2, which was double the estimates for cities with resident foxes in the 1980’s. Density was comparable to an alternative estimate derived from trapping and GPS-tracking, indicating the validity of the method. However, FGD did not correlate with a national dataset based on fox sightings, indicating unreliability of the national data to determine actual densities or to extrapolate a national population estimate. Using species-specific clustering units that reflect social organisation, the method was additionally applied to suburban badgers to derive relative badger group density (BGD) for one city (Brighton, 2.41 km-2). We demonstrate that citizen science approaches can effectively obtain data to assess suburban carnivore density, however publicly derived national data sets need to be locally validated before extrapolations can be undertaken. The method we present for assessing densities of foxes and badgers in British towns and cities is also adaptable to other urban carnivores elsewhere. However this transferability is contingent on species traits meeting particular criteria, and on resident responsiveness.
机译:在全球范围内,有许多示例性的食肉动物利用城市化的增长。由于食肉动物可能与人类发生冲突,并且是人畜共患疾病的潜在媒介,因此评估郊区的密度并确定影响它们的因素对于协助管理和缓解是必要的。但是,零散的私有土地限制了在这些地区使用常规食肉动物测量技术,因此需要开发新方法。我们提出了一种将问卷分发给居民的方法与现场调查和GIS相结合的方法,以确定英国,英国两个城市食肉动物的相对密度。我们确定了以下14个城市中的狐狸的密度:8个城镇中约1km 2 郊区的14个狐狸社会群体;和一个城市三个郊区的欧亚badge(Meles meles)社会团体。平均相对狐狸种群密度(FGD)为3.72 km -2 ,是1980年代有狐狸居住城市的两倍。密度可与诱捕和GPS跟踪得出的替代估计值相媲美,表明该方法的有效性。但是,烟气脱硫与基于狐狸目击的国家数据集没有关联,表明国家数据无法确定实际密度或推断国家人口估计数。使用反映社会组织的特定物种聚类单位,该方法还应用于郊区badge,以得出一个城市(布莱顿,2.41 km -2 )的相对badge群体密度(BGD)。我们证明,公民科学方法可以有效地获取数据以评估郊区食肉动物的密度,但是在进行推断之前,需要对本地公开的国家数据集进行本地验证。我们介绍的用于评估英国城镇中狐狸和rs密度的方法也适用于其他地方的其他城市食肉动物。但是,这种可转移性取决于满足特定标准的物种特征以及居民的响应能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号