首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?
【2h】

Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too “universal”?

机译:后生无脊椎动物DNA条形码错误的实例:通用cox1基因引物是否“通用”?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (cox1) gene is the main mitochondrial molecular marker playing a pivotal role in phylogenetic research and is a crucial barcode sequence. Folmer’s “universal” primers designed to amplify this gene in metazoan invertebrates allowed quick and easy barcode and phylogenetic analysis. On the other hand, the increase in the number of studies on barcoding leads to more frequent publishing of incorrect sequences, due to amplification of non-target taxa, and insufficient analysis of the obtained sequences. Consequently, some sequences deposited in genetic databases are incorrectly described as obtained from invertebrates, while being in fact bacterial sequences. In our study, in which we used Folmer’s primers to amplify COI sequences of the crustacean fairy shrimp Branchipus schaefferi (Fischer 1834), we also obtained COI sequences of microbial contaminants from Aeromonas sp. However, when we searched the GenBank database for sequences closely matching these contaminations we found entries described as representatives of Gastrotricha and Mollusca. When these entries were compared with other sequences bearing the same names in the database, the genetic distance between the incorrect and correct sequences amplified from the same species was c.a. 65%. Although the responsibility for the correct molecular identification of species rests on researchers, the errors found in already published sequences data have not been re-evaluated so far. On the basis of the standard sampling technique we have estimated with 95% probability that the chances of finding incorrectly described metazoan sequences in the GenBank depend on the systematic group, and variety from less than 1% (Mollusca and Arthropoda) up to 6.9% (Gastrotricha). Consequently, the increasing popularity of DNA barcoding and metabarcoding analysis may lead to overestimation of species diversity. Finally, the study also discusses the sources of the problems with amplification of non-target sequences.
机译:细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I(cox1)基因是主要的线粒体分子标记,在系统发育研究中发挥关键作用,并且是至关重要的条形码序列。 Folmer的“通用”引物旨在在后生无脊椎动物中扩增该基因,从而可以快速,轻松地进行条形码和系统发育分析。另一方面,由于非目标分类单元的扩增以及对获得的序列的分析不足,条形码研究的数量增加导致错误序列的发布更为频繁。因此,遗传数据库中存放的某些序列被错误地描述为从无脊椎动物获得的,而实际上却是细菌序列。在我们的研究中,我们使用Folmer的引物扩增了甲壳类神仙虾Branchipus schaefferi(Fischer 1834)的COI序列,我们还从Aeromonas sp。获得了微生物污染物的COI序列。但是,当我们在GenBank数据库中搜索与这些污染物紧密匹配的序列时,我们发现了描述为Gastrotricha和Mollusca代表的条目。当将这些条目与数据库中带有相同名称的其他序列进行比较时,从同一物种扩增出的不正确和正确序列之间的遗传距离约为c.a。 65%。尽管对物种进行正确分子鉴定的责任在于研究人员,但到目前为止,尚未对已发表的序列数据中发现的错误进行重新评估。根据标准抽样技术,我们以95%的概率估计,在GenBank中发现错误描述的后生动物序列的机会取决于系统的群体,变异范围从不到1%(软体动物和节肢动物)到6.9%( Gastrotricha)。因此,DNA条形码和元条形码分析的日益普及可能导致对物种多样性的高估。最后,该研究还讨论了非靶序列扩增问题的根源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号