首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Anaerobic capacity estimated by the sum of both oxygen equivalents from the glycolytic and phosphagen pathways is dependent on exercise mode: Running versus cycling
【2h】

Anaerobic capacity estimated by the sum of both oxygen equivalents from the glycolytic and phosphagen pathways is dependent on exercise mode: Running versus cycling

机译:由糖酵解途径和磷途径产生的氧当量之和估算的无氧能力取决于运动模式:跑步与骑车

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The purpose of this study was to verify whether the exercise modality (i.e., running and cycling) alters the magnitude of “anaerobic” capacity estimated by a single supramaximal effort (AC[La]+EPOCfast). Fourteen healthy men (age: 26±9 years) underwent a maximum incremental test and a supramaximal effort to exhaustion at 115% of the intensity associated with maximal oxygen uptake to determine the AC[La]+EPOCfast (i.e., the sum of both oxygen equivalents from the glycolytic and phosphagen pathways), performed on both a treadmill and cycle ergometer. The maximal oxygen uptake during running was higher (p = 0.001; large effect size) vs. cycling (48.9±3.9mL·kg-1·min-1 vs. 44.8±5.5mL·kg-1·min-1 respectively). Contrarily, the oxygen equivalent from the glycolytic metabolism was not different between exercise modalities (p = 0.133; small effect size; running = 2.35±0.48 L and cycling = 2.18±0.58 L). Furthermore, the “anaerobic” capacity was likely meaning fully (3.65±0.70 L) and very likely meaningfully (949.1±5.7 mL·kg-1) greater in running than cycling (3.81±0.71 L and 52.0±8.1 mL·kg-1). Additionally, the contribution of the phosphagen metabolism was higher (p = 0.001; large effect size) for running compared to cycling (1.6±0.3 L vs.1.3±0.3 L respectively). Therefore, the “anaerobic” capacity estimated by the sum of both oxygen equivalents from the glycolytic and phosphagen pathways during a supramaximal effort is influenced by exercise modality and is able to identify the difference in phosphagen metabolic contribution, based on the methodological conditions of this study.
机译:该研究的目的是验证运动方式(即跑步和骑自行车)是否改变了通过一次超最大努力(AC La + EPOCfast)估计的“无氧”能力的大小。 14名健康男性(年龄:26±9岁)接受了最大增量测试,并以最大吸氧强度的115%进行了最大的体力消耗,以确定AC [La] + EPOCfast(即两种氧气的总和)等价物(来自糖酵解途径和磷酸酶途径的等价物),同时在跑步机和自行车测功机上进行。跑步期间的最大摄氧量(p = 0.001;较大的影响量)高于自行车运动(48.9±3.9mL·kg -1 ·min -1 )与44.8。分别为±5.5mL·kg -1 ·min -1 )。相反,在各种锻炼方式之间,来自糖酵解代谢的氧当量没有差异(p = 0.133;效应量小;跑步= 2.35±0.48 L和循环= 2.18±0.58 L)。此外,“厌氧”容量在运行中可能比循环(3.81±0.71 L和52.0)充分(3.65±0.70 L),并且有意义地(949.1±5.7 mL·kg -1 )更大。 ±8.1 mL·kg -1 )。此外,与骑车相比,跑步中磷光素代谢的贡献更高(p = 0.001;较大的效应量)(分别为1.6±0.3 L和1.3±0.3 L)。因此,在最大努力过程中,通过糖酵解途径和磷酸酶途径的两个氧当量之和估算的“无氧”能力受运动方式的影响,并能够根据本研究的方法学条件确定磷酸酶代谢贡献的差异。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号