首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Morphology and life history divergence in cave and surface populations of Gammarus lacustris (L.)
【2h】

Morphology and life history divergence in cave and surface populations of Gammarus lacustris (L.)

机译:Gammarus lacustris(L.)洞穴和地表种群的形态和生活史差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cave animals provide a unique opportunity to study contrasts in phenotype and life history in strikingly different environments when compared to surface populations, potentially related to natural selection. As such, we compared a permanent cave-living Gammarus lacustris (L.) population with two lake-resident surface populations analyzing morphology (eye- and antennal characters) and life-history (size at maturity, fecundity and egg-size). A part of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene in the mitochondrion (COI) was analyzed to contrast genetic relationship of populations and was compared to sequences in GenBank to assess phylogeography and colonization scenarios. In the cave, a longer life cycle was implied, while surface populations seemed to have a shorter life cycle. Egg size, and size at maturity for both sexes, were larger in the cave than in surface populations, while fecundity was lower in the cave than in surface populations. The cave population had longer first- and second antennae with more articles, longer first- and second peduncles, and fewer ommatidia than surface populations. The cold low-productive cave environment may facilitate different phenotypic and life-history traits than in the warmer and more productive surface lake environments. The trait divergences among cave and surface populations resembles other cave-surface organism comparisons and may support a hypothesis of selection on sensory traits. The cave and Lake Ulvenvann populations grouped together with a sequence from Slovenia (comprising one genetic cluster), while Lake Lille Lauarvann grouped with a sequence from Ukraine (comprising another cluster), which are already recognized phylogenetic clusters. One evolutionary scenario is that the cave and surface populations were colonized postglacially around 9 000–10 000 years ago. We evaluate that an alternative scenario is that the cave was colonized during an interstadial during the last glaciation or earlier during the warm period before onset of the last glaciation.
机译:与表面种群相比,洞穴动物提供了一个独特的机会来研究在明显不同的环境中的表型和生活史的对比,这可能与自然选择有关。因此,我们比较了一个居住在洞穴中的永久性伽马鲁斯湖(L.)种群与两个居住在湖面的种群,分析了形态(眼和触角特征)和生活史(成熟度,繁殖力和卵大小)。分析了线粒体(COI)中一部分细胞色素c氧化酶亚基I基因,以对比种群的遗传关系,并将其与GenBank中的序列进行比较,以评估系统地理学和定殖情况。在山洞中,意味着更长的生命周期,而表面种群似乎具有较短的生命周期。洞穴中的卵大小和两性成熟时的大小均大于表层种群,而洞穴中的繁殖力低于表层种群。与地表种群相比,山洞种群的第一触角和第二触角更长,具有更多的物品,第一和第二花序梗更长,眼o更少。与温暖和生产力较高的地表湖泊环境相比,寒冷的低产洞穴环境可能促进不同的表型和生活史特征。洞穴和地表种群之间的性状差异类似于其他洞穴-地表生物比较,并且可能支持关于感官性状选择的假设。洞穴和Ulvenvann湖的种群与来自斯洛文尼亚的一个序列(包含一个遗传簇)组合在一起,而Lille Lauarvann湖与来自乌克兰的一个序列(包含另一个聚类簇)分组,它们已经被认为是系统发育簇。一种进化的情况是,洞穴和地表种群是在距今约9000-1万年前的冰川后殖民的。我们评估了另一种情况,该洞穴是在最后一次冰川形成期间的星际间或在最后一次冰川形成之前的温暖时期的早些时候定居的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号