首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Low versus high dose erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients with anemia: A randomized clinical trial
【2h】

Low versus high dose erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in hemodialysis patients with anemia: A randomized clinical trial

机译:贫血的血液透析患者使用低剂量或高剂量促红细胞生成素的药物:一项随机临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The increased risks of death and adverse events with erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapy targeting a higher hemoglobin level are established. It is uncertain whether the adverse effects of ESA therapy are related to dose and are mitigated when a fixed low ESA dose is used. We conducted a multicenter, prospective randomized open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial to evaluate fixed low versus high dose ESA therapy on patient outcomes. We intended to recruit 2104 hemodialysis patients >18 years with anemia or receiving ESA treated at dialysis clinics in Italy. The intervention was fixed low (4000 IU epoetin alfa equivalent weekly) or high (18,000 IU epoetin alfa equivalent weekly) dose ESA for 12 months. Primary outcomes were serum transferrin, ferritin, albumin, C-reactive protein and ESA dose. Secondary outcomes were the composite of death or cardiovascular event, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular hospitalization, and quality of life. Study recruitment was terminated after inclusion of 656 participants with convergence of ESA dose between groups during follow up. Fixed low dose ESA had uncertain effects on serum ferritin (delta of delta (DD) 3.9 ng/ml, 95% CI -85.0 to 92.8), transferrin (9.2 mg/dl, -6.3 to 24.8), transferrin saturation (3.7%, -5.0 to 12.3), serum albumin (-0.03 g/dl, -0.2 to 0.1), or C-reactive protein (-0.6 mg/l, -3.3 to 2.1). In addition, fixed dose therapy had inconclusive effects on the composite endpoint of mortality and cardiovascular events (hazard ratio [HR] 0.95, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.37), death (0.98, 0.64 to 1.52), nonfatal myocardial infarction (0.52, 0.18 to 1.52), nonfatal stroke (no events), hospital admission for cardiovascular causes (0.93, 0.50 to 1.72) or health-related quality of life. A fixed low ESA dose in hemodialysis patients has uncertain effects on serum parameters, mortality, cardiovascular events, and quality of life. Hemoglobin targets may be so entrenched in nephrology practice that a trial of ESA dose is no longer possible.
机译:建立了以更高血红蛋白水平为目标的促红细胞生成促进剂(ESA)治疗可增加死亡和不良事件的风险。当使用固定的低ESA剂量时,尚不确定ESA治疗的不良反应是否与剂量有关以及是否可以减轻。我们进行了一项多中心,前瞻性,随机开放标签,盲点(PROBE)试验,以评估固定的低剂量高剂量ESA治疗对患者预后的影响。我们打算招募2104名> 18岁的贫血或在意大利的透析诊所接受过ESA治疗的血液透析患者。干预为固定剂量的低剂量(每周4000 IU皮肤上的埃法阿法当量)或高剂量(每周18,000 IU上皮的神经钙素),持续12个月。主要结局指标为血清转铁蛋白,铁蛋白,白蛋白,C反应蛋白和ESA剂量。次要结果是死亡或心血管事件,全因死亡率,心血管疾病死亡率,心肌梗塞,中风,心血管疾病住院和生活质量的综合结果。在纳入656名参与者且随访期间各组之间ESA剂量趋同后,研究招募终止。固定的低剂量ESA对血清铁蛋白(δδ(DD)3.9 ng / ml,95%CI -85.0至92.8),转铁蛋白(9.2 mg / dl,-6.3至24.8),转铁蛋白饱和度(3.7%, -5.0至12.3),血清白蛋白(-0.03 g / dl,-0.2至0.1)或C反应蛋白(-0.6 mg / l,-3.3至2.1)。此外,固定剂量治疗对死亡率和心血管事件的综合终点没有决定性的影响(危险比[HR] 0.95,95%CI 0.66至1.37),死亡(0.98,0.64至1.52),非致命性心肌梗塞(0.52,0.18)至1.52),非致命性中风(无事件),因心血管原因入院(0.93,0.50至1.72)或与健康相关的生活质量。血液透析患者的固定低ESA剂量对血清参数,死亡率,心血管事件和生活质量具有不确定的影响。血红蛋白靶标在肾脏病学实践中可能根深蒂固,以致无法进行ESA剂量试验。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号