首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >The impact of local government investment on the carbon emissions reduction effect: An empirical analysis of panel data from 30 provinces and municipalities in China
【2h】

The impact of local government investment on the carbon emissions reduction effect: An empirical analysis of panel data from 30 provinces and municipalities in China

机译:地方政府投资对碳减排效果的影响:来自中国30个省市的面板数据的实证分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Among studies of the factors that influence carbon emissions and related regulations, economic aggregates, industrial structures, energy structures, population levels, and energy prices have been extensively explored, whereas studies from the perspective of fiscal leverage, particularly of local government investment (LGI), are rare. Of the limited number of studies on the effect of LGI on carbon emissions, most focus on its direct effect. Few studies consider regulatory effects, and there is a lack of emphasis on local areas. Using a cointegration test, a panel data model and clustering analysis based on Chinese data between 2000 and 2013, this study measures the direct role of LGI in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions reduction. First, overall, within the sample time period, a 1% increase in LGI inhibits carbon emissions by 0.8906% and 0.5851% through its influence on the industrial structure and energy efficiency, respectively, with the industrial structure path playing a greater role than the efficiency path. Second, carbon emissions to some extent exhibit inertia. The previous year’s carbon emissions impact the following year’s carbon emissions by 0.5375%. Thus, if a reduction in carbon emissions in the previous year has a positive effect, then the carbon emissions reduction effect generated by LGI in the following year will be magnified. Third, LGI can effectively reduce carbon emissions, but there are significant regional differences in its impact. For example, in some provinces, such as Sichuan and Anhui, economic growth has not been decoupled from carbon emissions. Fourth, the carbon emissions reduction effect in the 30 provinces and municipalities sampled in this study can be classified into five categories—strong, relatively strong, medium, relatively weak and weak—based on the degree of local governments’ regulation of carbon emissions. The carbon emissions reduction effect of LGI is significant in the western and central regions of China but not in the eastern and northeast regions. This study helps overcome the limitations of previous studies on the regulatory effects of LGI on carbon emissions, and the constructed model may more closely reflect actual economic conditions. Moreover, the current study can benefit countries similar to China that aim to objectively identify the impacts of their LGI on carbon emissions, and such countries can use it as a reference in the formulation of investment policies based on their economic and industrial characteristics.
机译:在对影响碳排放和相关法规的因素的研究中,对经济总量,产业结构,能源结构,人口水平和能源价格进行了广泛的探索,而从财政杠杆的角度,尤其是地方政府投资(LGI)的角度进行了研究。 ,很少见。在关于液化天然气对碳排放的影响的有限研究中,大多数集中在其直接影响上。很少有研究考虑监管的影响,并且缺乏对当地的重视。本研究使用协整检验,面板数据模型和基于2000年至2013年中国数据的聚类分析,衡量LGI在减少二氧化碳(CO2)排放中的直接作用。首先,总体而言,在样本时间段内,LGI的增加1%通过对产业结构和能源效率的影响,碳排放分别抑制了0.8906%和0.5851%,其中产业结构路径的作用远大于效率路径。其次,碳排放在某种程度上表现出惯性。上一年的碳排放量对次年的碳排放量造成0.5375%的影响。因此,如果前一年的碳排放减少具有积极作用,那么LGI在下一年产生的碳排放减少作用将被放大。第三,液化天然气可以有效减少碳排放,但是其影响存在很大的地区差异。例如,在四川和安徽等省,经济增长并未与碳排放脱钩。第四,根据地方政府对碳排放的监管程度,本研究中抽样的30个省市的碳减排效果可分为五类:强,相对强,中等,相对弱和弱。 LGI的碳减排效果在中国的西部和中部地区非常显着,而在东部和东北地区则没有。这项研究有助于克服先前关于液化天然气对碳排放的监管影响的研究的局限性,所构建的模型可能更紧密地反映实际的经济状况。此外,当前的研究可以使类似于中国的国家受益,这些国家旨在客观地确定其液化天然气对碳排放的影响,并且这些国家可以根据其经济和工业特征将其作为制定投资政策的参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号