首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >A Pine Is a Pine and a Spruce Is a Spruce – The Effect of Tree Species and Stand Age on Epiphytic Lichen Communities
【2h】

A Pine Is a Pine and a Spruce Is a Spruce – The Effect of Tree Species and Stand Age on Epiphytic Lichen Communities

机译:松树是松树,云杉是云杉–树种和林分年龄对附生地衣群落的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

With an increasing demand for forest-based products, there is a growing interest in introducing fast-growing non-native tree species in forest management. Such introductions often have unknown consequences for native forest biodiversity. In this study, we examine epiphytic lichen species richness and species composition on the trunks of non-native Pinus contorta and compare these to the native Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies in managed boreal forests in northern Sweden across a chronosequence of age classes. Overall, we recorded a total of 66,209 lichen occurrences belonging to 57 species in the 96 studied forest stands. We found no difference in species richness of lichens between stands of P. contorta and P. sylvestris, but stands of P. abies had higher total species richness. However, species richness of lichens in stands of P. abies decreased with increasing stand age, while no such age effect was detected for P. contorta and P. sylvestris. Lichen species composition progressively diverged with increasing stand age, and in 30-year-old stands all three tree species showed species-specific assemblages. Epiphytic lichen assemblages in stands of 30-year-old P. contorta were influenced by greater basal area, canopy closure, and average diameter at breast height, P. abies stands by higher branch density and canopy closure, and stands of P. sylvestris by greater bark crevice depth. Differences in lichen species richness and composition were mainly explained by canopy closure and habitat availability, and the greater canopy closure in mature P. abies stands promoted the colonization and growth of calicioid lichen species. Our results indicate that the non-native P. contorta have similar species richness as the native P. sylvestris. The main difference in lichen species richness and composition is between P. abies and Pinus spp. in managed forests of boreal Sweden.
机译:随着对基于森林的产品的需求不断增长,在森林管理中引入快速增长的非本地树种的兴趣日益浓厚。这种引入常常对本地森林生物多样性产生未知的后果。在这项研究中,我们研究了非本地松树树干上的附生地衣物种丰富度和物种组成,并将它们与按年龄年龄顺序排列的瑞典北部管理的北方森林中的樟子松和云杉冷杉进行了比较。总体而言,我们在研究的96个林分中共记录了66,209个地衣,属于57种。我们发现,斑节对虾和樟子松的林分之间的地衣物种丰富度没有差异,但是冷杉的林分具有更高的总物种丰富度。然而,随着林分年龄的增长,长白杨林分中地衣的物种丰富度下降,而对斑节对虾和樟子松未发现这种年龄效应。地衣的种类组成随着林分年龄的增加而逐渐分散,在30岁的林分中,所有三种树种均显示出特定于物种的组合。 30岁的斑节对虾(E. contorta )林分中的附生地衣组合受更大的基面积,冠层闭合以及乳房高度平均直径 P 的影响。 abies 具有较高的分支密度和冠层封闭性,而 P 具有优势。 sylvestris 的树皮缝隙深度更大。地衣物种丰富度和组成的差异主要是通过冠层封闭和生境有效性以及成熟的 P 中更大的冠层封闭来解释的。 abies 林分促进了类钙化地衣物种的定殖和生长。我们的结果表明,非本地 P contorta 具有与原生 P 类似的物种丰富度。 sylvestris 。地衣物种丰富度和组成的主要区别在于 P abies Pinus spp。在北方瑞典的管理森林中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号